Bryan Acheampong, the Abetifi Member of Parliament and Minister for Agriculture has assured farmers in Kwahu Nkwatia, Eastern Region, that their lands are not being seized under the new land development program to boost large-scale commercial agriculture.
Acheampong explained that the GHC40 million initiative focuses on developing agricultural lands and providing farmers with improved seeds and fertilizers to enhance their productivity and ensure food security. He emphasized that the program, designed to support large-scale farming, is voluntary and aims to improve the incomes of local farmers.
Addressing concerns during a meeting with local farmers, chiefs, and elders, Acheampong dismissed allegations that the government was forcibly taking land from farmers. He clarified that participation in the land development program is optional, and any farmers choosing not to join the initiative will see their lands remain unaffected.
“The traditional farming methods do not create substantial wealth because they cannot support larger-scale operations,” Acheampong said. “This program is intended to help farmers transition from traditional practices to more productive methods.”
Acheampong assured the community, “No land will be seized. Our goal is to develop the land so you can farm more effectively. If you choose not to participate, your land will not be involved.”
Opare Nyarko, a representative of local farmers, had previously raised concerns about the program’s impact and sought clarification from the government. Nyarko expressed worry over the lack of detailed information and broader engagement regarding the initiative.
In response, Acheampong assured that traditional authorities and key stakeholders are actively involved in selecting suitable lands for development and that farmers’ interests would be prioritized once approvals are secured.
The minister urged the people of Kwahu Nkwatia to avoid spreading misinformation that could undermine community development. He cautioned against inciting public opposition, stressing that such actions could hinder regional progress.
