Nana Yaa Jantuah, former Public Relations and External Affairs Director of the Public Utilities Regulatory Commission (PURC), has revealed details surrounding her departure from the organization, alleging she was forced out by elements within the Akufo-Addo administration.
She cited specific instances where she was pressured to act in favor of the government’s interests, despite her professional obligations.
Speaking candidly on Channel One TV’s Face to Face with Umaru Sanda Amadu, Nana Yaa Jantuah described the unjustified accusations and uncomfortable circumstances that led to her resignation. She mentioned being pushed out amid claims of arrogance and other unsubstantiated criticisms orchestrated, she believes, by government officials, a situation that highlights the unfair treatment she endured.
“It was during the NPP’s time, so they used people within my office. I heard snippets that I was accused of arrogance and other flimsy allegations,” she disclosed during the interview.
Despite the challenges she faced, Nana Yaa Jantuah’s unwavering dedication to her role at the PURC was never in question. Her professional competence was acknowledged by her colleagues and government officials, a testament to her effectiveness and commitment.
Her affiliation with the Convention People’s Party (CPP) was also cited as a factor in her forced departure, despite her appointment not being politically motivated. She expressed deep dismay over what she perceived as political victimization, possibly stemming from her family’s historical ties to the Nkrumahist tradition.
Nana Yaa Jantuah adamantly denied engaging in partisan politics during her tenure, attributing her treatment to her father’s activism alongside Dr Kwame Nkrumah, which had reportedly led to threats against her family in the past.
Reflecting on her commitment to public service, Nana Yaa Jantuah stated, “My allegiance was always to Ghana and my duty as a public servant. I approached my work with unwavering dedication and integrity, a commitment that was never in question.”
Nana Yaa Jantuah’s revelations underscore ongoing issues of political influence within public institutions in Ghana. This not only raises questions about fair treatment and professional integrity in administrative roles but also highlights the potential negative impact on the quality of public services and the public’s trust in these institutions.
