World Court: Important Victory for Habr? Victims / Senegal Should Bring Chad?s Former Dictator to Justice ?Without Further Delay?
BRUSSELS, Kingdom of Belgium, July 23, 2012/African Press Organization (APO)/ ? The ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on July 20, 2012 that Senegal must prosecute ?without further delay? or extradite Chad?s former dictator Hiss?ne Habr? is a great victory for his victims, a coalition of human rights groups said today. The ruling reinforces the obligation on all countries to bring to account people in their jurisdiction who are allegedly responsible for torture.
Habr?, 69, is accused of responsibility for thousands of political killings and systematic torture when he ruled Chad, from 1982 to 1990. He has been living in exile in Senegal for more than 21 years but has yet to face justice there. Senegal?s recently elected president, Macky Sall, has said he wants to prosecute Habr? in Dakar and ordered that proceedings begin by the end of the year. After prosecution in Senegal stalled, Belgium indicted Habr? in 2005 and has since requested his extradition four times.
?The world?s highest court said today that we have a right to justice,? said Souleymane Guengueng, who nearly died during almost three years of mistreatment in Habr??s prisons and later founded an association of victims to seek justice. ?Today, my friends who were tortured, the people I saw die in jail, those who never gave up hope, are one step closer to achieving justice.?
The Senegalese government has reacted to the judgment of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and ?reaffirms its commitment to hold the trial? of former Chadian President Habr? in a statement released Friday.
?The political will seems to be present in Senegal, the ICJ decision is clear, nothing should oppose the trial of Hiss?ne Habr? as soon as possible? said Ms. Souhayr Belhassen, FIDH President.
The decision brings an end to the suit Belgium filed against Senegal in February 2009 after Senegal refused to extradite Habr? and continued to stall on his trial before domestic courts. Belgium charged that Senegal had failed to meet its obligations under the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Under the charter of the United Nations, the World Court?s ruling is binding on Senegal.
The court found that Senegal had failed to meet its international legal obligations under the torture convention and ordered Senegal to bring Habr? to justice ?without further delay? either by prosecuting him in Senegal or extraditing him to Belgium.
?This decision is a victory for Hiss?ne Habr??s victims, who have been fighting for 21 years for their day in court; it is a vindication for Belgium, which had the courage to stand up for the victims; and it is a strong message to the new leaders of Senegal that they must move swiftly to fulfil their pledge to bring Habr? to justice,? said Reed Brody, counsel for Human Rights Watch, who has worked with the victims for 13 years. ?The ICJ declared that the Torture Convention means exactly what it says ? if someone commits torture, he has to be brought to justice, no ifs, ands or buts.?
By unanimous decision, the court ordered Senegal to ?without further delay, submit the case of Mr. Hiss?ne Habr? to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution, if it does not extradite him.? All but two judges agreed that Senegal breached the torture convention, first by failing to make an immediate preliminary inquiry into the crimes allegedly committed by Habr? once it became aware of the allegations against him, and again by failing to submit the case to its competent authorities for prosecution. The court noted that Senegal could have fulfilled its obligations by extraditing Habr? to Belgium.
The court rejected Senegal?s argument that difficulties in securing international financing prevented it from moving faster to bring Habr? to trial. It also ruled Senegal?s obligation to ?prosecute or extradite? Habr? was unaffected by a 2010 ruling by the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) requiring Habr??s trial before a ?special ad hoc procedure of an international character.?
The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Belgium?s claim that Senegal had also breached its obligations under customary international law.
The ICJ, which sits in The Hague, is the United Nations? highest court and generally deals with cases between UN member states. It has no jurisdiction to prosecute individuals.
The International Committee for the Fair Trial of Hiss?ne Habr? ? which comprises the Chadian Association for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (ATPDH), the Association of Victims of Crimes of the Regime of Hiss?ne Habr? (AVCRHH), the African Assembly for the Defense of Human Rights (RADDHO), Human Rights Watch, and the International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH), among others ? said that the decision would increase pressure on Senegal to bring Habr? to justice quickly. They also said it sets an important precedent for the 150 countries that have ratified the torture convention.
?Today?s decision is a resounding blow to the impunity of torturers and tyrants and a victory for torture victims all over the world. The court has made clear that states that ratify the Torture Convention have a binding legal obligation to investigate and prosecute cases of torture? said Souhayr Belhassen, FIDH President. ?We are confident that Senegal will finally intiate legal proceedings against Habr? for all crimes prepetraded during his regime?
Abdoulaye Wade, Senegal?s former president, raised obstacle after obstacle to preclude Habr??s trial in Senegal. However, following Sall?s victory in presidential elections in March, he said he wanted to prosecute Habr? in Senegal rather than extradite him to Belgium. In June, he called for proceedings to begin by the end of the year, and Senegal and the African Union (AU) are now engaged in talks in Dakar over creation of a special court within the Senegalese justice system to try Habr?.
?The decision by the world?s highest court marks another important step in the victims? tireless fight for justice,? said Jacqueline Moude?na, lawyer for the victims and president of the Chadian Association for the Promotion of Human Rights. ?Now it?s up to Senegal to follow through and ensure Habr? is tried for his crimes.?
The Nobel Peace Prize winner Bishop Desmond Tutu and 117 groups from 25 African countries in July 2010 denounced the obstacles to justice for the victims as an ?interminable political and legal soap opera.? The ICJ decision and the ongoing negotiations between Senegal and the AU could mark a turning point to bring justice within reach of Habr??s victims, the coalition said.
?The new Senegalese government has engaged on a campaign against corruption and impunity at the highest levels,? said Alioune Tine, president of the Dakar-based RADDHO. ?It should take heart from this ruling and show the world that an African country can deliver justice for crimes committed in Africa.?
Habr? ruled Chad from 1982 until he was deposed in 1990 by President Idriss D?by Itno and fled to Senegal. His one-party regime was marked by widespread atrocities, including waves of ethnic campaigns. Files of Habr??s political police, the Direction de la Documentation et de la S?curit? (DDS), which were discovered by Human Rights Watch in 2001, reveal the names of 1,208 people who were killed or died in detention and 12,321 victims of human rights violations.
Habr? was first indicted in Senegal in 2000. The country?s courts said that he could not be tried there, however, so his victims filed a case in Belgium. In September 2005, after four years of investigation, a Belgian judge indicted Habr? and Belgium requested his extradition, but a Senegalese court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to decide on the extradition request.
Senegal then turned to the AU, which in July 2006 called on Senegal to prosecute Habr? ?on behalf of Africa.? President Wade accepted the AU mandate and had Senegalese law amended to give the country?s courts extraterritorial jurisdiction over international crimes. However, years of wrangling over the trial budget ensued. Senegal and donor countries finally agreed to a budget of ?8.6 million (US$11.4 million) for Habr??s trial in November 2010. Just days earlier, ECOWAS ruled that Habr? must be tried before a ?special ad hoc procedure of an international character.?
In January 2011, the AU responded to the ECOWAS court ruling by proposing a plan for a special court within the Senegalese justice system with some judges appointed by the AU. President Wade rejected the plan. Senegal and the AU continued discussions, however, and, in March 2011, agreed in principle to a new plan creating an ad hoc international tribunal. In May 2011, however, Senegal withdrew from negotiations with the African Union over creation of the court.
In July 2011, Senegal threatened to expel Habr? to Chad but, days later, retracted its decision in the face of an international outcry. The Chadian government then announced its support for extraditing Habr? to Belgium to face trial.
In September 2011, Belgium submitted another extradition request to Senegalese authorities, but in January the Senegalese courts dismissed the request on technical grounds after the Senegalese government apparently failed to transmit the Belgian legal papers intact to the court. Belgium submitted another extradition request shortly thereafter and that request remains pending.
To read the International Court of Justice?s decision on Belgium v Senegal, please visit:
To read a summary of the International Court of Justice?s decision on Belgium v Senegal, please visit:
To read the International Court of Justice?s press release on Belgium v Senegal, please visit:
For more FIDH reporting on the Habr? case, please visit:
For Human Rights Watch?s ?Questions and Answers? on ?Belgium v Senegal,? please visit:
For a timeline of events in the Habr? case, please visit:
To follow the Habr? case on Facebook, please visit:
International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH)