Does Charles Takyi-Boadu Think He Has The Capacity To Destroy The NDC?

0

Commentary

Charles Takyi-Boadu, the newest lapdog for Gina and Freddie Blay, must be living in a world of dreams and deluding himself into believing that he has what it takes to destroy the NDC.
A rather fine gentleman when he was working with The Chronicle, Charles Takyi-Boadu has become a personification of everything bad and stinking about journalism.
Charles Takyi-Boadu is the one that Gina Blay and Freddie Blay have put on the NDC to manufacture and churn out outright lies.
Charles Takyi-Boadu is the new kid on the block, who must write and say nasty things about no less a person than the President of the Republic.
As if his by-line means nothing to him, he writes all his fairytales with glee and gusto.
Most recently, Charles Takyi-Boadu lied to the whole world that he had interviewed Mr. Martin Amidu in the wake of the latter being asked to drop his tools.
In the said fairytale, Charles Takyi-Boadu created the false impression that Martin Amidu threatened to “spill the beans” if he is pushed to the wall.
How funny!!!
Which beans?
The truth of the matter is that there are no beans to be spilt.
If there is anything to be spilt; it is the dead brain cells of Charles Takyi-Boadu, which can be reassembled to make his head work better.
The truth of the matter is that, Martin Amidu told Charles Takyi-Boadu not to push him to the wall, lest he pours his heat on the Daily Guide.
Charles Takyi-Boadu, in his infantile mind, thought that he could push Martin Amidu to the wall for the latter to speak and create confusion within the NDC.
When Martin Amidu refused to fall for the bait, Charles Takyi-Boadu kept asking foolish questions; and that is what compelled Martin Amidu to tell Gina Blay’s poodle not to push him to the wall lest he pours his anger on The Daily Guide.
What Charles Takyi-Boadu does not know is that; many have done the stinking hatchet job that he is doing now; and they did not ‘survive’.
Yes, many people did what Charles Takyi-Boadu is doing but they did not survive.
Is it not a shame that Charles Takyi-Boadu turns himself into an object of scorn, when he had the rare opportunity to question the President during the recent media encounter at the Castle?
Out of the over hundred journalists present, Charles got a rare opportunity, but asked the President if he was suffering from cancer.
How foolish!
If Charles wants to know if somebody is suffering from cancer, why does he not ask his boss Gina Blay?
If Charles Takyi-Boadu is looking for cancer patients, why does he not take a close look at Gina Blay and Freddie Blay?
Does Charles Takyi-Boadu think we do not know what is happening at The Daily Guide?
Can Charles Takyi-Boadu tell us where Gabby Asare-Otchere Darko is?
Does Charles Takyi-Boadu think we don’t know that Akufo-Addo sneaks out of town every now and then to go for medical treatment in London?
We are not fools, and so we will not say all the things that we know.
Is Charles Takyi-Boadu more interested in cancer patients than in media houses that become safe heavens for homosexual and paedophiles?
It was interesting hearing Charles Takyi-Boadu say after the media encounter that he was not allowed to ask other questions.
How foolish!!
When you have the opportunity to ask a single question, and you ask a foolish question, why should you be given the opportunity to ask another foolish question?
The President is not in the business of answering foolish questions; he is in the business of answering intelligent questions.
Watching Charles Takyi-Boadu on TV, his body language exposes him as a senseless agent who was just doing the bidding of his paymasters.
Does Charles Takyi-Boadu not know a certain Baby Ansabah also known as Ato Sam, who was thrown out of The Daily Guide after spending years doing the dirty work for Gina Blay and Freddie Blay?
Is it not under the watch of the NDC that Baby Ansabah is living a decent life today?
Under the watch of NPP, Gina Blay and Freddie Blay, was Baby Ansabah not one of the least respected journalists in Ghana?
Have the likes of Fortune Alimi and A.R Gomda not slowed down?
Charles Takyi-Boadu should ask Fortune Alimi and A.R. Gomda why they have decided to no longer do the dirty work for Gina Blay and Freddie Blay.
Has Halifax Ansah Addo not also slowed down after his initial attempt to be the hit-man for Gina Blay and Freddie Blay?
So if those who were there before he arrived, have taken a wise decision not to continue to do any dirty job for Gina Blay and Freddie Blay, why is Charles Takyi-Boadu so much in hurry to become the most insulted, disrespected, disliked, and disgraceful journalist in Ghana?
Is it not the case that Charles Takyi-Boadu got married recently?
Does he want his wife to be walking around with people pointing fingers at her?
Nobody is forcing Charles Takyi-Boadu to love President Atta Mills and the NDC; all we are saying is that, he is gradually becoming a disgrace to the journalism profession and gradually becoming the Baby Ansabah of Daily Guide.
As for those of us on The Informer, we think that Charles Takyi-Boadu has what it takes to become a fine and level-headed journalist.
But if the young-man chooses to mortgage his conscience and family name to Gina and Freddie Blay, and succeeds in receiving the Order of the Vulture award (an award that was incidentally instituted by Gina Blay’s Daily Guide), for being the most disgraceful and stinking journalist in Ghana, that is his own cup of tea.
The Informer has spoken; if Charles Takyi-Boadu has ears, let him hear ooooo!!!
And if Charles Takyi-Boadu thinks he has the capacity to bring down the Atta Mills Administration, he may end up walking half-naked around Asylum Down and talking to himself because not even Hercules can take up such a task.
Charles Takyi-Boadu, The Informer has given you free advice; take it or leave it!!!

The Informer

ELDERLY PEOPLE NEED HELP, WELFARE – AMOSUN’S WIFE

0

Elderly people need help, welfare – Amosun’s wife
From Our reporter
Thursday, January 26, 2012

• Amosun
Wife of Ogun State Governor, Mrs. Olufunso Amosun has advised the younger people to pay attention to the welfare of the older ones, saying ageing was a gift from God and elderly persons deserve to be taken care of.

According to her, “our desire is to fill in the gap of fulfilling the social needs of vulnerable elderly people who are lonely, who lose touch with their environment, who struggle hard in their daily activities, who are down-hearted and who need daily basic health care. We hope to regularly bring them a wonderful forum to make them happier and uplift them.”

Entitled, “uplifting the aged,” Mrs. Amosun said, “ageing is not a big issue, but there may be vulnerable older persons who have no relatives to look after them. This is one area we should be able to offer a helping hand to our elderly people to lift them up and make them happy.”

Speaking at a ceremony organised for the elderly people across the 236 wards of Ogun State at the June 12 Cultural Centre in Abeokuta, Mrs. Amosun said it’s the desire of many people to live long enough to have their hair turn grey and as “our elderly ones grow older they need our support and care.”
The programme coincided with Governor Ibikunle Amosun’s birthday anniversary but since the governor said there would be no formal gathering to mark the day, the First Lady chose to spend the day with the needy aged.

The programme, which had in attendance more than 1,000 participants, afforded the aged the opportunity to undertake free health screening and referral services, talks on availability of safe blood for communities during emergencies and light exercise practice. They were also given items like blankets, rice, gari, groundnut oil and token cash gifts.

PPPRA SEALS OFF FILLING STATIONS IN OSUN

0

PPPRA seals off filling stations in Osun
From BAMIGBOLA GBOLAGUNTE, Osogbo
Thursday, January 26, 2012

• Amosun

The Petroleum Products Prices Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) yesterday sealed off no fewer than six filling stations in Osogbo, the Osun state capital for allegedly selling premium Motor Spirit otherwise known as petrol above the N97 per litre announced by the agency.
The filling stations, located around Oke Baale and Ilobu Road areas were selling a litre of petrol for between N100 and N105, a development which was described as illegal by the PPPRA.

The PPPRA task force led by Mr John Ikwejuibe stormed Osogbo in the early hours of the day and moved round the town to find out filling stations selling above the normal pump price announced by the Federal Government. Mr Ikwejuibe who announced that the affected filling stations would remain closed until further directive of the agency, warned petroleum dealers in the state against noncompliance with the pump price of petroleum products.

He said the action was taken by the agency to avoid further fraudulent practices by petroleum dealers in the country and the state in particular. Also, Mr Ikwejuibe cautioned petrol dealers in the state against adjusting their machines, saying, “whoso ever is discovered to have adjusted the pump machine of their filling stations will also have their stations closed down by the agency.”

He said the agency would continue to beam its search light on the state to ensure total compliance with the new pump price of N97 per litre as directed by the Federal Government, adding that any petrol dealer who sells above the price would be punished appropriately.

FROM ABDULGAFAR ALABELEWE, KADUNA

0

A’Court confirms Senator Datti’s sack
From ABDULGAFAR ALABELEWE, Kaduna
Thursday, January 26, 2012

The Court of Appeal sitting in Kaduna on Tuesday dismissed Senator Ahmed Datti’s appeal against the National Assembly Election Tribunal that nullified his election and ordered Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to issue his opponent, Senator Ahmed Mohammed Makarfi, with Certificate of Return as the senator representing Kaduna Northern Senatorial Zone.

With this development, the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and former governor of the state, Senator Ahmed Mohammed Makarfi is to replace Congress for Progressive Change (CPC’s) Senator Datti in the upper chamber of the National Assembly.
The National Assembly Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Kaduna had on November 14, 2011 nullified the election of Datti and declared Makarfi the winner of the election.

Ruling on the matter on Tuesday evening, the presiding judge, Justice Amina Augie said, considering the provision of Section 285, Sub-section 7 of the 1999 Constitution, which stipulated the time frame of 60 days for the hearing of appeal from election tribunal to be filed before the Appeal Court, the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
Justice Augie in the 22-minute ruling, which ended 7:33pm, said though counsel to the appelant, Mr. Abbas Ibrahim argued that the delay in the hearing of the appeal was not caused by either of the parties involved in the case, the Constitution was very strict about the 60 days.

She further stressed that even if the court was to hear the appeal today (on Tuesday), the appeal was not yet before the court.
“What is before the court as we speak are applications for extension of time to file the appeal proper and application to regularise the appellant’s appeal before the court. “We can only say the court has an appeal before it when there is an application for appeal and record of proceedings of the previous judgement,” she stressed.

Earlier in his argument, counsel to the appellant (Senator Datti), Mr. Abbas Ibrahim said the 60 days ought to have lapsed on January 12, 2012 but due to the nationwide strike and the 24 hours curfew imposed on Kaduna State during the fuel subsidy protest, the court had the jurisdiction to hear the appeal. “If the court looked critically at the provision of Section 285 (7) with the aim of ensuring justice, not merely looking at it technically, the court has jurisdiction to hear the appeal,” he said.

On the contrary, counsel to the first respondent (Senator Makarfi), Yunus Ustaz Usman (SAN) argued that in the first place, the appellant was responsible for the delay, considering his failure to file the appeal before the court within the stipulated period of 60 days.

ANSWERS TO OUR POSERS TO PPPRA, UNSATISFACTORY

0

Answers to our posers to PPPRA, unsatisfactory
–Senator Abe, Chairman Petroleum Resources (Downstream) Committee
By ADETUTU FOLASADE-KOYI
Thursday, January 26, 2012

• Sen. Abe

Senator Magnus Ngei Abe has the unenviable task of seeking answers to how the fuel subsidy scheme is being run by the Federal Government and how the N240 billion appropriated by the National Assembly snowballed into N1.3 trillion in the 2011 fiscal year.

In this interview with ADETUTU FOLASADE-KOYI, Senator Abe, Chairman of the Petroleum Resources (Downstream) Committee, reviews the role of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) in the oil sector and explains why a forensic investigation of government’s subsidy regime is necessary at this point in time. Excerpts:

Last year, your committee convened a public hearing on the management of the fuel subsidy scheme. What’s happening?
It’s not correct to say that you’ve heard nothing from the committee. We conducted public hearings and we’ve been holding series of meetings to try and clarify some of the issues that cropped up in the course of the public hearing. We intend to visit some of the facilities that we think the joint committee would need to see before we submit our report to the Senate.
|
So, next week or the upper week, depending on the logistic arrangements that we are able to put in place, the committee would probably be visiting Lagos to look at some of the facilities that you heard them talk about in the course of the investigation. We’ve also decided that we would need to talk to some of the importers to hear their side of the story and put forward some of the concerns that have been expressed by not just members of the committee but also by the Nigerian public; to try and give them some opportunity to make their own case and then, we also have a few lingering issues that we want to clarify with the PPPRA before we can conclude.

So, we invited them to come on January 17 but because of the concurrent investigation in the House of Representatives, they couldn’t make that meeting with our joint committee but we are looking to fix another date where they can come and clarify those issues with the Senate. So, the Senate investigation is very much on course and as soon as we finish with these few remaining issues and any other that may come up from some of our other members, we would be submitting our report to the Senate.

What are the likely issues that you would discuss with the PPPRA?
There are some loose ends, arising from the public hearing that members want to tidy up before we can draw conclusions on those issues and as we were working on our documents, we saw some loose ends and we also saw outstanding questions they had promised to provide answers to and we are not satisfied with the answers they brought. So, those are the things we are planning to tidy up.

Would it be open?
Initially, we didn’t think it would be open but the meeting with the importers would be open; those that would be invited because we think that it is important that whatever we discuss with them should be visible to the Nigerian people and the Nigerian public. The meeting would be open. We have some companies that we have concerns about which we have listed and we also have some we are picking at random, not because we have any issues with them but because we want to give as many companies as possible an opportunity to have their say and to also, have an opportunity to speak on the issue. So, we would be inviting them and it would be in the open.

The security agencies are already moving in. Do you think the Senate probe is still necessary?
I don’t think that the involvement of the security agencies or the EFCC in anyway takes away from the fact that as a country, if there are lessons to be learnt from this, we need to learn those lessons, we need to chart a way forward. We are not just going to sit down and…if security agencies are investigating a matter that (should) end a Senate investigation that has been on-going since last year. If you would recall, we had invited EFCC to come for the public hearings. We actually sent letters, inviting them to be part of the public hearing. So, we expected that based on what they hear from the public hearing, if they wanted to invite people to ask questions, they are free to do so.

We didn’t expect that at any time that would mean that our investigation must stop. No. What they are pursuing are criminal aspects of this thing and if it’s uncovered…and if we see things that the country ought to learn lessons from, we would also point them out so that we can make corrections to move the country forward. If there were places where we would have invited the EFCC to come in, they are already there. That’s superfluous. We may no longer need to do that but we had invited them from the very beginning to be part of the process because we knew that Nigerians would need to be satisfied that a proper forensic examination of these issues are carried out by those who have the capacity and the required training and facilities and the legal backing to ask those questions properly in that manner. So, we envisaged that; we don’t think that interferes with the Senate investigation.

How would you describe the concurrent probe of the subsidy scheme in the National Assembly? Is it not duplication because there is one National Assembly?
Are you telling me or you are asking me?

Both; because it appears to be a duplication of efforts in the two chambers.
Well, you know, we are always very, very careful how we discuss issues within the National Assembly outside. But this investigation you know was ongoing and then, the House felt a need to look at the same issue. I can’t really comment on an issue that is within the National Assembly. Maybe, if I see the Speaker (of the House of Representatives) and if I have something to say, I would say it to him.

So, you agree there’s duplication of efforts?
No, I won’t agree. I won’t use the word: duplication, because you are dealing with convention. The House has its own legal rights and responsibilities and obligations. The Senate has its own. Usually, the convention is, we try not to do the same thing at the same time. So, it’s a convention. There is no legal authority. Mind you, the Senate investigation has been on since last year. It’s not appropriate for me as a Senator to make a public comment on a matter that is within the National Assembly. We have one National Assembly.

We have a Chairman of the National Assembly who is the President of the Senate; we have a deputy chairman who is the Speaker of the House of Representatives. So, if we have any issues within the National Assembly, it would be handled by the National Assembly Service Commission. It cannot be handled by an individual senator addressing the press. I don’t think that is how issues of that nature can and should be handled. But what I would want you to appreciate is that the House of Representatives is a legal entity with its own constitutional rights and powers and the Senate is a legal entity with its own constitutional rights and powers also. So, there is a whole lot happening.

Will there be a convergence later?
Well, we will talk but we won’t talk in the media.

In the course of the subsidy scheme, you promised Nigerians that you would get answers. Has the committee been able to do that?
When we started this investigation, we promised the country that the investigation would be open, all questions would be asked in the open and it would be a transparent process that would be visible to the Nigerian people. I think the question you are asking me can be better asked from the Nigerian people. Did they get the answers that they expected to get? I think that if you review the (public) hearing, you would know that a lot of light was shed on the whole issue of subsidy and how it is managed and what it is. I think substantially, we got a lot of answers. But, are we satisfied with all the answers we got? Definitely not. But, did we get answers? I think Nigeria and not just the committee got a lot of answers from that process.

When are you inviting the marketers?
Right now, we have challenges with time in the Senate but we are looking at next week, January 23-28, because we first wanted to do some site inspection of some of the facilities for receiving these products and storing them so that we can make some on-the-spot assessment of some of what we heard at the public hearing. So, after that, we would talk with the marketers before we decide on what exactly the report would say.

The Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) has told the House of Representatives committee on the probe of the subsidy scheme that NNPC imports crude oil. Was your committee told about that in your investigative hearing?
I don’t want to comment on the importation of crude oil for Kaduna refinery because I really don’t see it as a dramatic revelation because when Kaduna was built, there was some subtle knowledge that it may refine products other than Bonny Light. So, I don’t think that’s a very dramatic issue because if you have a refinery that has capacity to refine other products than crude, you have to get it to refine it. That’s an issue that NNPC would have to clear. Our own investigation substantially is the management of the fuel subsidy scheme…As far as the issue of subsidy management is concerned, the committee was able to, as a committee, get a clear understanding of the management of subsidy, its challenges, problems and I think the Nigerian people also saw that. That was the purpose of the hearing and I’m very satisfied with the progress we’ve made so far.

In the course of the public hearing, some names were released. Are you going to forward these names to the EFCC to aid it in its investigation?
First of all, there is a law and there are rules for the importation of petroleum products into this country and for payment for those who do so. It is not everybody who imported petroleum products that is a criminal. There are challenges with the way the scheme was managed; there are those who are alleged to have, of course, used unethical practices in order to enrich themselves at the expense of the Nigerian people but this is something that has to be determined by a clear forensic investigation of the situation. On the face of it, between you and I, or as a layman, clearly, I believe that things went wrong with the management of the fuel subsidy regime. But who exactly committed what crime and what laws were broken would be determined by a criminal investigation process which, as you pointed out, is on-going.

On the names we read, Nigerians wanted to know those who were participating in the scheme, those who were benefiting and being paid and I didn’t think that in a country of 160 million people, we should be asking such questions in a democracy! I felt that that information should be open to everybody. I didn’t see why we were behaving as if it was something that you needed to belong to a member of a cult to have access to that information. I didn’t see it that way. As part of the investigation, we gave that information to the public. That is not, therefore, to say that everyone who was named is necessarily a criminal. I don’t think so. So, the issue of forwarding this information to EFCC is quite unnecessary because they were part of the investigation from the beginning. They were assumed to have been there when the names were read. They don’t have to wait for us to forward the information to them.

Whatever information we had, they also have. That was why they were invited to the investigative hearing in the first place. So, whatever information is available to us is also available to them at the same time it was also available to you and the Nigerian public. What I’m trying to say is that first, there is no basis to conclude that because you took part in the importation of petroleum products under the subsidy scheme you are a criminal. That would not be fair neither would it be correct. But there is a basis for seeing clearly that there were certain irregularities in the way these things were managed.

There were loopholes through which these people took advantage of; which you may not be able to find actually but there were also some…These things would be determined by forensic investigation which the Senate really doesn’t have the capacity to carry out and we are glad that those who are empowered by law and have the tools and the resources to carry out that kind of examination are already on which is what we would have asked for anyway. So, they are already on and I think that at the end of the day, all of us who are Nigerians would like to know what the outcome of that investigation would be.

On the price regime o f PMS which the filling stations are finding difficult to adjust to
They will adjust. What the new price regime means is that subsidy is still with us in reduced volume or reduced price. We have not yet achieved full deregulation which is what will end subsidy. So, as long as subsidy is here and the PPPRA has fixed the price regime, any marketer who sells outside of that price is breaking the law and the full force of the law would be brought to bear on such marketers.

That is the law. I have been in touch with PPPRA and I think they have a hotline; so, anybody you see selling above the stipulated price of N97, you call PPPRA and disciplinary measures would be taken against such a marketer because right now, we have not achieved deregulation. So, there is no basis for anyone to sell at N141. There is still price regulation in place which is fixed right now at N97.

On the PIB as it affects deregulation. What are your expectations as far as that bill is concerned?
Quite frankly, there is no way you would make such a revolutionary re-organisation of the oil industry in this country without going through challenges. I think it would be naïve of any Nigerian to think so. I know for a fact that there a lot of interests, economic interests, political interests, social interests that are tied into the oil sector. In dealing with a subject like the PIB which seeks to reshape the industry, re-create it and quite frankly, remake it on a commercial basis and take out a lot of the wastes and a lot of the unnecessary patronage that is presently associated with the industry, I don’t think you can achieve that without some level of turbulence.

I think you would have some of those challenges but the important thing is that if those key actors in this, namely the federal government, the National Assembly, our own people, if we all put the interest of Nigeria first, finding a common ground and passing a law that would actually enable the petroleum industry to develop to the benefit of the Nigerian people would not be too difficult an assignment. I know that oil industry players would have their own interests which they would like to see written into the law but we are Nigerians; the resource belongs to us and it is the interest of our people that we should promote over and beyond anything else. And you also have to remember that in promoting the interest of our people, you must make sure that those who participate in the industry can get fair returns for their investment because if they don’t get it, then even trying to get something for your own people would be useless. It’s not rocket science.

There are existing models in other societies they have used that has worked and is working very well. You can take the case of Malaysia, which has Petronas, that of Brazil which has Petrobas; even the Libyan Oil Company; all these are reforms in their oil sectors which have resulted in national oil companies themselves becoming major economic and big time players in the industry. They are even investing in other societies outside their countries and bringing home profit from their investments. Instead, our own NNPC is a source of debt, it’s a source of patronage, it’s a source of waste, it’s a source of mismanagement of the oil industry. So, the PIB is supposed to take care of all that and anytime you want to change something that people are benefiting from, there’s bound to be challenges and many of you know that that is always the case. People don’t give up their benefits easily.

What’s your opinion about the task force set up by the Petroleum Minister?
I don’t work in the Ministry of Petroleum Resources; I’m a senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. When the bill is brought to the Senate, I would have my opportunity as a senator and as chairman of the Petroleum Resources (Downstream) to make my input. Whatever processes the executive wants to use to clarify their own thoughts and sieve through whatever proposals they have in order to arrive at a document that they are comfortable with, that they understand properly, that they believe would work in the best interest of the Nigerian people is exactly and totally within the purview of the executive.

If the minister decides to do that by a task force, by a committee, by a technical team or whatever, that is her prerogative as a minister. I can’t sit here and comment on it but what I know is that before any PIB would become a law in this country, it would come to the Senate and every senator would have an opportunity to make contributions and so would the House of Representatives. It’s the National Assembly that ultimately would pass the law and as I said earlier, as we speak today, it has not been re-introduced but I’m glad and happy that the executive is working hard to the knowledge of Nigerians to speed up efforts to see that the PIB is re-introduced into the National Assembly.

How soon should Nigerians expect your report?
We are very, very mindful of the fact that the country would benefit from speedy conclusion of this assignment because the subsidy regime is still in place and whatever we can do to make it work better and more efficiently, I think would be to the benefit of the Nigerian people. We are all very conscious of that and that is why we are ready to do whatever it would take and as quickly as it would take to get it done so that whatever recommendations the Senate would have to make to government and the operators of the subsidy regime to make it more efficient and useful to the people and more transparent, we would make those recommendations.

I believe that given the amount of interest that this has generated, I think that even without waiting for the recommendations; I believe that the NNPC, Petroleum Ministry, PPPRA and the Presidency are already working on ways of trying to make the process more transparent. I know for one that they’ve dispensed with the pool arrangement and working directly with tank farm owners. They’ve brought in some form of innovations to try to improve on what they are doing. I met with the Executive Secretary of the PPPRA and he told me about some of the actions they have taken on their own at this time, including bringing in international inspectors at the point of discharge.

They have done some things to try and improve on public confidence in the process. So, everybody is working and we believe that whatever recommendations we can make that would help that process would benefit this country. But, definitely, the way it was run before, I don’t think it’s going on like that after the public hearing and I don’t believe it can go on like that given the interest of the people in a more transparent and accountable subsidy regime.

WHY I WENT INTO TOILET BUSINESS– DUROJAIYE

0

Why I went into toilet business– Durojaiye
By ’NIYI OKIRI
Thursday, January 26, 2012

•Durojaiye

Out of the very close personal aides responsible for the orderly day-to-day activities of the late Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola, very few learnt a handful of secrets from the mogul’s business savvy and were able to run away with equally a few wands from the acclaimed winner of the June 12, 1993 presidential election’s bag of tricks. One such lucky ‘relative’ is the Executive Vice Chairman/CEO of DMT Mobile Toilets, Chief Isaac Durojaiye (aka Otunba Gadaffi).

At a time when those who took the late chief’s presence for granted, including his blood relatives, were ‘dying’, Otunba Gadaffi was planning to immortalize the name of his great benefactor. Where most were eyeing and claiming rights to the late maestro’s estates (home and abroad), Durojaiye saw a need to show what he had gained serving MKO, in the establishment of an outfit, the least the modern day businessman would dream of…shit carrying, a vocation formerly identified with particular clans in Nigeria.

And, yes, he’s had a resounding success where ‘no Eagle dares’, picking up international and local honours and awards through 20 years of commendable service. And he’s delving again into the ‘magic box’ for another ‘trick’ that would extend his credibility and expand his horizon…the conversion of shit into bio-fuel, and other related by-products. The Otunba lays it all open in this one-on-one with The Sun, including a few national issues begging for attention.
Excerpts:

Why ‘shit’ business?
Everybody shits. Yes, it started like an idea, a child’s play. In 1992 I was in charge of a big society wedding, where we had about 10,000 guests and only two toilets were available. That was when the idea of mobile toilets came to me, and in 1996, it became a business. I expanded the idea; we constructed the toilets locally and today it’s working! But if you look at it before now, Nigerians celebrate anything, especially in the south. And when they are celebrating, there are no conveniences. But, today, if not for the fact that we have entered into that area, Lagos, with a population of about 18 million, couldn’t boast of 500 functional clean public toilets.

I beg to be challenged by anybody. They equip the toilets but they are not properly maintained; they were dilapidated, dirty and stinking. Not until we went into that sector. So, you can imagine if Lagos is populated by about 15 to 18 million people and you have about 2,500 functional toilets, indirectly 2,500 people are employed and are there to maintain. Therefore, shit carrying has now become a business. So we tell people not to see construction and provision of toilets as a social service anymore, but as a business!

Gone are the days when the public toilet is seen as a municipal council business. Today it has become a business and attracts creativity and passion. Now, we have just introduced a set of toilets that are fully air-conditioned with MP-3 player, red-carpet reception and satellite TV…giving you the glamour you may not be able to provide for yourself. Apart from when you make love to your wife – or your lover – when you’re naked, the only other time you’re naked is when you’re in the toilet. And if you don’t empty your bowels, it becomes health hazard to you; and that means you could do it in a nice, convenient environment. We should glamorize the way people answer the call of nature. There is no big man in the bathroom, it’s only the soap the individual uses that might be different.

You see, pride is a disease, a barrier. It is what does not allow people to see business opportunities open in an environment where there is so much suffering and so much problems. It is only pride that would make a graduate to say; ‘I am a graduate; I have a degree in so and so, therefore, I cannot go and learn tailoring; I cannot go and learn carpentary; I cannot go and learn welding; I cannot go and acquire a skill’. It all boils down to pride. You see, the moment we can learn to take pride out of our lives, we’ll see so many business opportunities open to us. Listen, when we were young, we had people coming to do washings in our homes; we called them Alagbafo (contract dry-cleaners) or Washerman. They will wash and dry, and mostly return the second day to iron the dried clothes…and they get paid. Apart from the well-established dry-cleaning companies, how many people still do that today? Forgetting that they can start from that small Alagbafo and become the biggest dry-cleaning company in town.

Yes, we say ‘Shit business is serious business’. If you’re not serious, how can people defecate on the ground and we’ll say we want to go and pack it? Shit is not what anybody wants to tamper with anyhow. And we don’t discriminate against any shit, regardless of race, sex, religion, language, creed or distance. But against all odds, we have been able to prove to doubting ‘Thomases’ that it is possible. Even some members of my family think that after my long sojourn abroad, this might not the right thing for me to do. But today, I’m Senior ‘Agbepo’ of Nigeria (SAN).

Creativity / Integrity
But, you see, people have attached some notion or sentiment to certain jobs. Nobody wants to sweep the streets of Lagos anymore; they want to leave such jobs to those old men and women, forgetting that you can sweep the streets of Lagos and be creative about it, and be passionate about it, and you can make a statement. They are talking about keeping Lagos clean; let some people organize themselves and begin to clean the streets and gutters. Before you know it, they would have attracted attention.

And they would appeal to passersby and get N100 here and N200 there, and that is how it all starts. You see, one way or the other, indirectly, whether you like it or not, you are contributing your own quota to the development of the country because when the country is neat, it will attract foreign investments and the economy will boom. It’s not all about oil, and it’s not all about banking. It is about creativity and entrepreneurship. You see, all these micro and small businesses are the things that build an economy.

We ventured into ‘shit’ (excrement) business having realized that people will hire canopies, tables and chairs; they will provide good food, good music, and every other thing that goes with a party. And when they are pressed for nature, where would they go to ease themselves? That was what brought about the idea of Mobile Toilets and, today, it has become an industry. We now have public toilets and private conveniences everywhere, so that when people are organizing functions, they have toilets to use. And, you see, waste must be created – solid, liquid or shit – and they must be managed, and if the onions fall on us to manage human waste, we want to do it with all sense of pride and dignity. I don’t want to cover my face because I pack ‘shit’, as was obtainable in the past. It’s my job and I dignify it. And when Nigerians begin to dignify and introduce integrity in what they do, all these Boko Haram, whatsoever, would not be there.

Yes. Integrity has been bastardized. People want to get rich quick. Members of the National Assembly and all those in government are stealing and embezzling the people’s money. So, the young graduate who is supposed to imbibe the culture of integrity, patience and build some business wants to get rich overnight…and when that happens, what happens? The machine that drives the society is broken down. So, nobody wants to do certain jobs. I was talking to a young lady very recently; she just graduated last year.

She was telling me categorically that she couldn’t take a job that pays less than N100,000 a month. It means that she might end up a prostitute, because she has registered it in her psyche that she would not accept any job that pays less than N100,000 a month. And when her type gets to the position of authority tomorrow with her thinking, she’ll start embezzling. You must start from somewhere, building experience and establishing yourself. And when you start your own business, you need a minimum of about five years for it to stabilize.

What we are saying is we found ourselves in doing this business and we are proud about it; we’ve built integrity around it and I’m passionate about it. I’ll talk about shit anywhere. People are complaining about problems in Nigeria. If there are no problems, where would the opportunities come from? So, I see no problem; I see only opportunities. Tell me, where has it being said that a vulcaniser should be sweating it out in the sun while mending tyres? Can’t we be innovative, create a decent environment and when motorists develop flat tyres, they’ll sit in a cossy atmosphere, while they are being attended to.

You could even offer them a bottle of Coke or a cup of tea and you can indirectly build the cost into their charges. That’s creativity. Even to be a prostitute, you need creativity to succeed. That’s why you’ll see some call girls in skimpy, tight skirts and body hugs; they’ll now apply so much ‘oil’ on there legs, so that when motorists are driving past at nights, the headlamps pick up their images and they become attractive. If they don’t expose their breasts and parts of their ‘yansh’, how would people notice the compliments of their bodies? But they are being creative in a negative way. So, you see, in anything legitimate that you do, you need creativity, you need passion, and you need commitment.

We all love ‘Booli’. Don’t you eat ‘Booli’ (roasted plantain). Most of the time you patronize those women on the roadside when you want to buy ‘Booli’. Where is it written that it is only those women that must roast ‘Booli’…in a dirty environment? People should be creative. Get a shop, a nice oven, and introduce packaging. If you’ve traveled towards Ife a few times, there is a place called Kosu, where they sell ‘Akara’ (beans cake). They wrap them in papers and sell to buyers. What stops them from being a little creative? They could make a nice box and put the ‘akara’ in it. The quantity you want can determine the size of the box…so when a buyer comes, you fold it up like the take-away box and hand it over neatly. Creativity!

It is not compulsory that you must invent a new process; you can develop on a process and improve on it without compromising quality. In those days, when you want to go to interview someone, you take a writing pad and a midget recorder, but with the improvement in technology, virtually everything is inside your phone. Formerly, when I’m driving and I remember something, I pick up my tape and talk into it…but today I record such information inside my phone, and play back whenever I need to make references or notes. Somebody has introduced a process; now you can record whatever you want and you can take photographs with your phone. That’s creativity.

The Bio-fuel idea
I always ask this question of people that ‘where did God deposit crude oil?’ Inside the earth – gold, diamond and other mineral resources that mankind will need to survive are deposited therein. And when God wanted to create you and I, He took us from the ground, so inside me and inside of you sitting here, there’s an element of gold, there’s an element of diamond, there’s an element of precious stones and so many other wonderful things. So, all we need to do is to discover that thing that God has deposited inside of us. We can turn our passion to business, we can turn our talents to business; things that we do naturally could be turned into businesses.

Ever since people have been evacuating ‘soak-away’, they have all ended up inside the lagoon, whereas this thing can be a source of material. We’ve been talking about lack of electricity, lack of energy. This thing can be converted into electricity, and you can imagine if, today, we decide to convert all the shit that end up in the lagoon into electricity, we would not be talking about lack of electricity in Nigeria by now. Again, this is creativity.

Thinking big, thinking out of the ‘box’. So, no waste is wasted. Government has been talking about ‘Waste-to-Wealth’. This is nonsence because, to me, there is nothing like waste-to-wealth. I see it as ‘waste to job opportunities’. That is why all these so called waste-to-wealth programmes have not succeeded. It is not compulsory that when you go to waste, you get wealth; but when you create a job opportunity for yourself and it is properly handled, then you get wealth.

Inspiration from MKO
In terms of financial gains, I would say I did not make much. But I learnt some virtues in him. When you are so close to a man like that, you shouldn’t look at what you gain from him financially. You should avail yourself of the ability to learn what makes him tick. Chief was humble; he commands humility and respect. He never forgot that he came from a very poor background and, in so doing, he always remembered the poor. That was why he was making all those philanthropic gesture, and there is no way you do that and not succeed. God Almighty Himself set the law: ‘The more you give, the more you get! Another thing I learnt from that man was that he doesn’t give up; he never believes in impossibility. He was hardworking and passionate about it.

Future goals
I want to be the Bill Gates of shit in Nigeria; the Dangote of shit. There is success and failure in everything, as much as there is time for everything. Sometimes we try to outrun God, but He’ll withhold His Glory when it is not time. For every success made, there is the hand of God in it.

RINGIM’S LAST MOMENTS

0

•Ringim’s last moments
From MURPHY GANAGANA, Abuja
Thursday, January 26, 2012

• Ringim

After several weeks of intense lobby and battle to secure his office, the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Alhaji Hafiz Ringim was shown the exit door yesterday, as President Goodluck Jonathan bowed to pressure and announced an Assistant Inspector General of police (AIG), Mohammed Dikko Abubakar, as his replacement. President Jonathan also announced the retirement of all the six Deputy Inspectors Generals of police (DIGs).

They are Mrs. Ivy Okoronkwo who was second-in-command to Ringim, and Mr. Azubuko Udah, who was the DIG ‘A’ Department. Others are Messrs Sarduana Abubakar, Audu Abubakar, Saleh Abubakar, and Mohammed Yesufu.

Out of the six DIGs, two of them, namely, Audu Abubakar and Saleh Abubakar, were due for retirement on March 1, 2012. Others had a period of about one or three years to remain in the service. For instance, while Ringim’s second-in-command, Mrs. Okoronkwo was to retire on August 1, 2013, the DIG ‘A’ Department, Azubuko Udah, was expected to bow out of the force on August 1, 2014, and the DIG ‘E’ Department, June 5, 2013.

The statutory date due for retirement for the DIG ‘F’, Mohammed Yesufu, is April 30, 2014. Ringim’s sack came amid efforts by an influential clique of high ranking officers in the security community to shield him from the sledgehammer, which had dangled over his head for about six months, following the spate of bombings and rising insecurity across the country.

Daily Sun learnt that the ex-IGP, who was expected to retire from service on March 1, was asked by President Jonathan to prepare his handing over notes yesterday at the end of the weekly Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting. He had been summoned to the Villa earlier in the morning. Indications that the Jigawa State-born number one cop might have lost the battle to retain his job emerged shortly after he departed the Aso Rock Villa at the end of a closed-door meeting with the President on Tuesday.

Sources hinted that Ringim’s mood was in sharp contrast with his usually boisterous self as he drove out of the presidential villa, where he had earlier shunned the State House correspondents, as he pleaded to be left alone. Checks indicated that after the meeting with President Jonathan on Tuesday, the ex- IGP drove to his official residence located at the Maitama District of Abuja, where he pulled off his uniform and spent some hours before he left for his office under the cover of darkness at about 8:00pm. He rode to his office in an SUV and back-up car, without the usual blare of siren.

His mission to the office at that period could not be ascertained, but it was believed that he might have been there to remove his personal belongings, since he got wind of his replacement on Tuesday. He reportedly told some of his close aides before leaving to see President Jonathan yesterday morning that his time was up.

Speculations on Ringim’s removal were rife as early as 10:00am yesterday, amid conflicting signals in respect of the official quarters from where the pronouncement would be made. Suspense and anxiety mounted as reporters awaited an official statement on his sack from the Presidency, the Ministry of Police Affairs, or Police Service Commission [PSC].

But by 2.30pm, reports indicated that AIG Mohammed Abubakar, who was in charge of the Zone 12 police command with headquarters in Bauchi, had been flown from his base aboard a presidential jet to Abuja. And by 4:00pm, it was confirmed that the new IGP was at the villa where he met with President Jonathan and departed at about 5:10pm. As at press time, the new IGP was being awaited at the police force headquarters.

TERRORIST OUTRAGES: IT’S UNFAIR TO BLAME JONATHAN!

0

Terrorist outrages: It’s unfair to blame Jonathan!
From the Other Side By Lindsay Barret
Thursday, January 26, 2012

It has become commonplace for some commentators to accuse Dr. Goodluck Jonathan of everything from negligence to incompetence as a consequence of the outrages perpetrated against innocent Nigerians by the dreaded “Jamatul Ahlil Sunnah lit daawati wal jihad” generally called “Boko Haram”. Since the Kano debacle we have been fed with various forms of “expert advice” from many who claim to have the answer to what is fast becoming Nigeria’s greatest aberration.

Many have of course called for the sacking of the security chiefs, and one can hardly blame them. The disgraceful revelations of what is beginning to look like collusion rather than confusion in the behavior of some security agencies, especially the Nigerian Police, justifies almost any allegation of professional delinquency on the part of these bodies. For example, the presence of Commissioner Zakari Biu in the police force without any apparent qualified scrutiny, given his well-documented record of abuse of office in the past, beats the imagination. But the President could not be expected to personally monitor the deployment of rogue appointees. It was a serious breach of both professional intelligence and ordinary common sense for someone with Biu’s antecedents to have been put in charge of such a sensitive assignment.

The interrogation and investigation of a miscreant with the profile of the individual who is now being described as the mastermind behind the Madalla Christmas Day bombing should have been handled by the State Security Service (SSS) right from the outset. From the moment that he was captured the suspect should have been in the custody of what is assumed to be the most effective arm of state security without any chance of escape. The coincidental timing of his escape and the terrifying outrage in Kano has raised the criminal profile of the terrorist organization, which has warned all commentators to desist of from calling it “Boko Haram”.

This organisation now poses a serious threat to the common good in Nigeria as a whole even though so far its most determined attacks and operations have been concentrated in some Northern states. The provocation of sentiments of resistance and chauvinistic protectionism in some Southern states will certainly follow the outrage in Kano although the victims of this outrage have overwhelmingly been people of Northern origin who in many cases were adherents of the Islamic faith. Those who claim to be the perpetrators have made it clear that they wish to provoke a division of national interests. Their pre-attack warning, which was widely circulated in Kano for days before the actual operation commenced indicated that their targets would be the agents of government enforcement and security that they regarded as having targeted their members.

This same document characterised “Christians” as collaborators with the official agencies. This showed that while the perception of their rationale is widely allied to religious bigotry their true purpose is even more sinister. The perpetrators of this outrage are determined to impose anarchy on the society in pursuit of an improbable objective. Dr. Jonathan cannot by any stretch of the imagination be accused of having created the climate for such an intrinsically destructive agenda. Even though the security apparatus of the government, which he largely inherited rather than created, has been impotent in confronting the rise of terror represented by these outrages it is wrong to attribute the tragic development to the failure of the government that he is presiding over. To do so would be to legitimise terror as an instrument of change. The slaughter of innocents cannot and should not be condoned on any count and those political opportunists who have been quick to point fingers at the President are not helping matters at all.

It is very easy for us to point fingers but we should not forget the old adage that says “When one finger points at others four point back at the pointer (accuser).” The underlying focus of the problem represented by the rise of home-made terrorism keeps changing as the nature of the outrages change. Let us not forget that last year’s UN bombing forced us to consider the extent of international collaboration and what the ultimate objective of the core perpetrators might be. Since then we have heard of territorial and religious motives for continuing outrages but one thing that has been clear is that the main purpose of the perpetrators has been to intimidate ordinary citizens and create chaos. Unfortunately they have achieved what can be described as a qualified success in promoting their agenda.

It is quite clear that the security apparatus of the state has failed either to adjudge the extent and strategic weight of the terrorist organisation or to comprehend the true nature of its organisational form. The success of its tactical initiative of surprise uprisings in increasingly populous and strategically important metropolises has signaled the existence of a formal plan and motives that are quite predictable. In spite of this the security forces have constantly been wrong-footed by the perpetrators of these outrages. They have continually claimed to be making headway against these forces while consistently being taken by surprise. In fact it is becoming quite clear that Dr. Jonathan has been misled by his security advisers to the same extent that he appears to have been misled by some of his economic advisers over the likely consequences of the abrupt removal of the fuel subsidy. It is unfair to accuse a leader of causing problems caused by circumstances that precede his tenure but he must be answerable for the consequences of condoning inefficiency and accepting bad advice.

These are the only grounds on which the outrages in the North could possibly be blamed on Dr. Jonathan but in the present circumstances he is clearly not entirely at fault. Just as his advisers on the economic and social fronts have come equipped with impressive recommendations his security advisers lay claim to impressive professional credentials. What is becoming increasingly obvious is that the level of threat to the overall stability of the nation that is being faced by the Jonathan Administration is unprecedented. Those of us who can remember the period preceding the start of the Nigerian Civil War find the present circumstances frighteningly similar if not even more distressing. The fundamental differences between the form of the nation then and now could easily conspire to aggravate negative sentiments of territorial distrust. In the sixties Nigeria was a flawed federation replete with inequalities among the four regions.

Today Nigeria is an even more flawed federation beset by diverse interests and objectives being manipulated by the political leaders of thirty six unequal states. Dr. Jonathan bears no responsibility either for the foundation on which the nation that he leads is built or for the fundamental processes that have undermined its stability. Nevertheless he cannot totally extricate himself from blame over the failings of the security and other forces under him. He must restore confidence in the ability of government to anticipate and react with courage to a strategy of unprecedented brutality, but he cannot accept blame for the emergence of this strategy. Those who want him to admit culpability are overlooking the true dangers that the new terrorist element poses in Nigeria’s historic evolution. They are suggesting that regional equity is a secondary element in defining leadership in Nigeria. That suggestion spells doom for the nation. Under the present circumstances Dr. Jonathan cannot be accused of setting the stage for this.

MY SOUR TALE OF WAR VICTIMS –ADA AGBASIMALO

0

My sour tale of war victims –Ada Agbasimalo
By DAMIETE BRAIDE
Thursday, January 26, 2012

•Ada Agbasimalo

War is never an antidote or the best way to resolve issues. This is because war usually has its negative consequences on society. In her new book, The Forest Dames, Ada Agbasimalo, educates readers on her war experiences that must be told to free the mind and prick the conscience of the agitators.

Agbasimalo has written two books entitled Bow You Must and Waves of Destiny which draws the attention of the reader to male/female relations aside exploring avenues to set it right by creating room and space. The books both paint the picture of the strength of womanhood, oftentimes undermined.

In a recent chat with Daily Sun, Agbasimalo spoke on why she went into self-publishing, how she copes with writer’s block and the kind of words she uses in her works.

My new book
The Forest Dames is a novel based on war experiences that must be told in order to free the mind, disseminate information and prick the conscience of war agitators. It is a true life story that was fictionalized.
The book tells the story of a young girl who lived with her parents in the relatively calm and peaceful British colony of Nigeria, where shortly after independence compatriots went for each other’s throats. This soon exploded into a full blown civil war and from that time onwards, nothing was ever the same again.

The war came with ugly incidences, one of which was the hunt for and abduction of girls and women to be forcibly converted to bed-mates. Families sought hiding places for their ‘eligible’ females but these hide-outs were soon discovered through the power of and intimidation from the gun. Two women however decided that their daughters would never be made victims. They found a ‘safe haven’ for their daughters – the evil forest where the roars of wild animals were continually heard. But this is nothing compared to the brutal termination of lives and wanton destruction of properties through air, land and marine attacks; including starvation that was the order of the day, and which placed the final death mark on the people.

The forest dames, four in number, survived the war and one of them decides to tell the unfortunate story of the elasticity of human suffering. All four dames are still alive and can be reached for further interactions. One of the brave mothers is also still living. The main character is Deze, a young girl with keen mind who lived with her parents in an African setting and observed the Biafran war between the late 60s and early 1970. Upon becoming an adult, the memories remain intact, haunting her.
The Forest Dames is astrident voice detailing and condemning potentially malignant actions that continue to impede the development of African nations and indeed parts of the Third World…

Why I went into self-publishing
My first two books were equally self-published. I think the question should be ‘why did you publish abroad? My first two books were ill-published and as a result received less attention than they deserved. Furthermore the publishing and marketing strategies were faulty.

This time the book is so finely published that it is delightful to hold and read. It is clean and properly aligned and bound; unlike my first book where sometimes page 40 comes before page 19 and some pages are upside down, while others are blank; and the printing blotted. It was very embarrassing. Anyway the book was published in 1999 and I think that by now things must have changed. Let no one get me wrong, I don’t mean that there are no great publishers in Nigeria; I was just not fortunate enough to get their attention. And you know what they say about being once beaten and doubly shy.

My previous books
My first two books are entitled Bow You Must (1999) and Waves of Destiny, (2006). They both draw attention to male/female relations and explore avenues of creating room and space for all because as it is said, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. The books paint the picture of the strengths of womanhood, oftentimes undermined. Since I have been told by many that they are very good books, I am republishing them. I have retouched them and will soon get them republished because people are actually calling for those books.

Inspiration
The same drive that inspired me to write my first two books – passion. But there are many interestingly incredible and intriguing things that happened in the past in Nigeria that must not be waved away with the hand. For knowledge sake, it is only fair to allow those who do not know to know. Several stories have been told about the strategies and logistics of the civil war fought in Nigeria before many were born. Several people have read them but not many stories exist in book form about what happened at home while the war raged at the battle grounds. A lot of the stories are based on hearsay but when one emerges from a situation and decides to narrate the experience, it is usually different, and if the narrator happens to be so strong-willed as to promise herself that she would not like to depart mother earth without letting the world have a different dimension of the story, then that becomes the big reason behind writing the book.

Why it took me some years before coming up with a new book
I wanted the book to be well cooked, well brewed, if you like. I really hope I achieved that. Also there was a lot of back and forth movements between me and the publishers. Some of my editors delayed the book and sometimes I needed to confirm some issues before going further while at other times the manuscript had to be retrieved for modification. All these contributed and besides, I was tied down somewhere and had little or no time to attend to my book matters. Thank Goodness I got free and focused on my book, and here it is. It is on Amazon.com, Barnes and Noble and several other online marketers.

My target audience in the Forest Dames
My work is classified under the adult category, as opposed to children’s books. But my work is so clean that young adults and teenagers can read and understand it. My target audience therefore is every literate adult. The Forest Dames is targeted at everybody who wants to know why war is not an option or alternative and why we must flee from the idea of war. Since everybody is expected to know, the book is targeted at everybody, virtually.

Choice of words in the new book
I said earlier that even young adults can read my books. This is because they are written in a fluid, simple and proper grammatical format. It is standard but if some however find the need to consult their dictionary to understand certain portions, it is all part of the merit of the book and that aids the learning process.

Advice to upcoming writers
Do not be in a hurry. Do not venture into areas you know nothing about. Do not steal other people’s ideas, be original and if you do borrow any one’s ideas, be humble enough to acknowledge them. Even after your book has been reviewed, read it again, in between lines because it is your book, you know what you mean in everything you write. Avoid ambiguity and repetitions. Keep it simple, It is not true that the bigger the grammar, the better for the book. Do not set out writing for money, write for satisfaction first then fame and money can come later. Identify with other writers and ask questions when you don’t understand. Do not procrastinate, start now.

How I cope with writer’s block
Writer’s bock is inevitable, even when you are writing about something you have on your finger tips. When it happens to me, I literarily close shop for a while. In the interim, I watch stupid films to unwind, I read other people’s books, I play and dance to my favorite music, crack jokes and just feel happy all the way. Sometimes I keep away from writing for months and that also causes delay in completing the work. Writer’s block is good because it forces the writer to slow down a bit.

BAFARAWA IS A COMMITTED IDEOLOGUE

0

Bafarawa is a committed ideologue
By Kande Ibrahim
Thursday, January 26, 2012

I refer to BROKEN TONGUES of Thursday, December 23, 2011 on Sokoto politics especially as it concerns Alhaji Attahiru Bafarawa and wish to interject as follows.
Since the return of Alhaji Attahiru Bafarawa, the former Governor of Sokoto State, to his original party, the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), many of those who are not familiar with his politics have tended to give a mischievous interpretation to his action. While some feel that Bafarawa is not committed to any political idea, others are of the impression that his main objective is to grab power from whatever political platform.

Those who hold these views have their right to speculate or guess. Unfortunately, their guess or speculation is very much off the mark. As a politician, Bafarawa is driven by the belief that the people are the fulcrum of governance. His interest always is to adopt an approach in governance or in politics that will ensure that the dividends of democracy reach the people, especially those at the grassroots.

As one of the founding fathers of ANPP, Barafawa ensured that those who were elected under the platform of the party respected this guiding principle of the party. That was why as the Governor of Sokoto State, he embarked upon projects and programmes that impacted very positively on the people. It is an indisputable fact that Bafarawa’s record in the area of road construction, for instance, remains unequalled by any Governor, past or present, in Nigeria. Even the former President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, was so impressed by Bafarawa’s stride in this area that he christened him ‘Road Master”. But this is just an example. The fact is that Bafarawa has a political idea which goes beyond the confines of political association.

As someone who made ANPP proud as a performing Governor, Bafarwa left the party not because of any selfish political pursuit. He left because the then leadership of the party was infiltrated by external elements who, with the backing of the Presidency, ensured that the party was weakened and incapacitated for serious electoral contest. When he could not rescue the party from the stranglehold of the quislings within and the scavengers from outside, Bafarawa left to form the Democratic Peoples Party (DPP). However, the fact remains that even though the DPP was different in name, it was one and the same thing with ANPP in terms of ideology and focus. What this means is that Bafarawa may have left ANPP because certain circumstances forced him to do so, but he did not leave behind the kernel of the party. He went away with it and nurtured it afresh in DPP.

It is significant to note that the powers-that-be at that time who dictated who would be what from Abuja were very much aware of Bafarawa’s game plan. He wanted to use the DPP to keep Sokoto State intact. They had destabilized the ANPP believing that it was the end of Bafarawa’s political journey. But when he took the soul of ANPP and relaunched it in DPP, the forces after him were afraid. They became jittery. That was why they entered into an emergency coalition with the ANPP they had destroyed. They got the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to acquire the remnants of ANPP with the aim of fighting Bafarawa at the polls. But the alliance could not muster the strength to face up to DPP. But because they were desperate to shove Bafarawa aside, the presidency moved in, using all instruments of coercion and suppression. That was how they manipulated the 2007 elections in the state and awarded victory to PDP which did not have a stronghold in Sokoto.

Regardless of what the Presidency did to decapitate DPP, the fact remains that the party was the people’s choice because its leadership broadly represented by Bafarawa was focused on better life for the people. It did not therefore matter that Bafarawa left ANPP at the time he did. What was important was that he remained committed to the ideology that recognized the primacy of people in politics and governance.
The reason behind Bafarawa’s exit from DPP should also be properly understood. Those who know anything about party politics will appreciate the fact that expediencies play a big role in deciding or determining the direction of politics. In Sokoto State, DPP fought a good fight at that material time. But it was muzzled out of the way by a high level conspiracy that included the judiciary. Of course we all are living witnesses to how the political perfidy visited on DPP by powerful forces destroyed the very fabric of the judiciary in Nigeria. But that is a story for another day.

The point being made is that DPP served its purpose. But the need arose for Bafarawa to join forces with other democrats who want to wrest power from PDP in order to bring about good governance in Nigeria. Thus, the idea of a mega party came up. The arrowheads were General Muhammadu Buhari, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, Alhaji Attahiru Bafarawa and Alhaji Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Unfortunately, the idea of a mega party could not fly. The political actors who were supposed to make it happen, for whatever reason, went their separate ways. Buhari joined the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) and was later to become its presidential candidate. Atiku returned to PDP. Bafarawa was left alone with Tinubu. At this point, the idea of a mega party had died.

But one thing was clear-Bafarawa did not lose focus. He still remained committed to his political ideals.
At the time the idea of a mega party fizzled out, the ANPP in Sokoto State had also been milked dry by PDP. The PDP had got what it wanted and did not need ANPP anymore. But what gain did the people of Sokoto State derive from this? The people took a hard look at what PDP was giving them in terms of governance in the state and decided that they will bring back their man, Bafarawa. Thus began the move to get him to return to ANPP and reinvigorate it.

Since Bafarawa’s political philosophy and ideas are still embedded in those of ANPP, he had no difficulty making up his mind. The decision to return to ANPP was not borne out of selfish motive. It was done in the interest of the people of Sokoto State.
If Bafarawa were a political prostitute as some uninformed people would have us believe, he would have joined the PDP. After all, there was much pressure on him to join PDP in 2007 so that he would retain power in the state. Bafarawa rebuffed such overtures because he does not believe in PDP’s philosophy and ideals. It is only a committed ideologue like Bafarawa that will remain true to his political convictions. If he were not, he would have joined the PDP where anything goes.

Bafarawa therefore needs to be commended for his decision to return to ANPP. He is on a rescue mission. He has come to bring back the lost glory of the party. The party used to be strong when the likes of Bafarawa held sway. It lost steam following its decapitation by the Presidency. Today, some of the founding fathers of the party like Bafarawa are poised to reclaim has soul.

Ibrahim writes from Abuja.

BOKO HARAM: KANO CAN URGES CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS TO PRAY FOR DIVINE INTERVENTION

0

Boko Haram: Kano CAN urges Christians and Muslims to pray for divine intervention
From Desmond Mgboh, Kano
Thursday, January 26, 2012

The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Kano State chapter, has called on both Christians and Muslims in the country to pray for divine intervention over the incessant attacks by members of Boko Haram.

The Islamist sect’s many attacks had claimed hundreds of lives. The Kano blast killed 166 people last Friday. The body also appealed to the non-indigenes, fleeing from the state, to stay, noting that God is in charge. Making the call on Wednesday, the CAN state chairman, Bishop Ransome Bello, said the exodus is not a solution to the present predicament facing the country, while insisting that with prayers, all things are possible.

He observed that there is no place where both good and bad human beings do not co-exist, insisting that the Almighty God would one day touch their hearts to retrace their steps for good. He noted that they have received a tremendous support from the Muslim community in the state who have continued to assure them that they too condemned the killings.

He appealed to both the religious and traditional rulers in the state to use their positions to dialogue with Boko Haram beacuse they are human beings who are given to reason.
Bishop Bello called on the state government to consider the advice given by members of Nigeria Inter-Religious Council (NIREC) on the need to establish the state and local government chapters.

Secretary of CAN, Apostle Isaac Bello, urged all to embrace peace, saying no tangible development can take place in any society characterized by chaos and anarchy.

ONIGBINDE WARNS NIGERIA AGAINST FIFA’S HAMMER

0

Onigbinde warns Nigeria against FIFA’s hammer
By MERCY JACOB
Thursday, January 26, 2012

Onigbinde

FIFA and CAF instructor, Chief Adegboye Onigbinde, has warned against FIFA’s hammer against the country, saying that NFF doesn’t need to inform the House of Representatives before changing its name.

“It is better that both parties come together and discuss, to avoid FIFA’s hammer. I want to advise those who are already in jubilation mood to hold their peace because this problem will degenerate to what will not favour Nigerian football, even though, I believe that Nigerian football needs re-organisation but that is not the way to do it, from the FIFA Statutes, NFF doesn’t owe House of Representatives any obligation to inform it before changing its name.

Meanwhile, Onigbinde said that Nigeria was not missed at the on-going Africa Nations Cup in Gabon and Equatorial Guinea.
Before the present edition, many almost believed that Nigeria had a God-given right to participate at the biennial African showpiece, stressing that the competition without the country would lose its shine.

But having watched proceedings a few days after the start of the African football premier championship, Chief Onigbinde said he had come out with the verdict that the football fiesta had its glamour fully intact without Nigeria.

“For me, the Nations Cup is bubbling without anybody missing the so called big names in African football, who is conspicuously absent as result of her inability to qualify for the African World Cup. The insinuations of not having a high competitive game at the event are all false. In fact, with the way football is growing in Africa, time would come when all these countries who are not known in football would take over the African football fiesta. In football, names don’t play football, neither do names achieve result, if you fail to plan well, you should not expect to achieve good result.

As far as I’m a concerned, the 16-team currently jostling for the prestige African trophy are the best we have in the continent for now. The only thing all the teams missing in this tournament should do is to fight hard to be in the next competition coming up next year in South Africa.

PDP IS FINISHED IN ZAMFARA—LIMAN, GOV’S AIDE

0

PDP is finished in Zamfara—Liman, gov’s aide
From ATTAHIRU AHMED, Gusau
Thursday, January 26, 2012

Kabiru Sahabi Liman is Commissioner for Budget and Economic Planing, Zamfara State, and a former member of the state House of Assembly. In this interview, he said with the recent court verdict that upheld the election of Governor Abdulaziz Yari, the era of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), in the state is over. Excerpts:

Governor Abdulaziz Yari
Abdulaziz Yari is a gentleman with vision and mission of transformations. Something keeps telling me that he has people in mind. One interesting thing about him is when he speaks, you can quote him. He does not double speak. When God gave him the mantle of leadership, his desire to transform the state was too glaringly. He has the zeal and love for the state to progress. He wants to see that the state meets with other states in terms of rapid transformation. The first 100 days of his administration was remarkable. The people are begining to marvel about his achievements.

ANPP in the eyes of the people
I do not think anybody that has the love of the party and the state at heart would say the All Nigerian Peoples Party (ANPP) is not strong. It was true during our campaign there was intense struggle and high politicking in the party. ANPP has been the ruling party for eight years. The defection of former governor Mamuda Aliyu Shinkafi to PDP did not shake us even for one day. ANPP members passed through vigorous test before the last April general elections that saw Yari as governor.

PDP has no chance in Zamfara State
The era of PDP in Zamfara politics is over. More than 90 per cent of the electorate in the state are members of ANPP. We knew how the election was won and we would build on that and evolve strategies to better the lives of our teeming supporters. Apart from that, the governor has promised to transform the state. People have started seen development. There is no vacancy in Zamfara Government House. Yari is the people’s choice and our choice for the betterment of the state. God has choosen him for us.

Court verdict upholding Yari’s election
With the recent verdict, it has vindicated the judiciary. It also proved that there is rule of law in this country. Before the ruling, some thought the governor was going to lose his seat. But we were confident that victory would be ours. We have capable and competent lawyers, we trusted them and they gave us the assurance that victory would be ours. We beat them in this round, Insha Allah, we will beat them again.

Appeal Court
No shaking at all, nothing will change. It would remain by the power of God whom we trust and believe. The mistake of the PDP is that they are looking at the whole thing from political point of view. I am appealing to them to accept the wish of Allah. Allah gives power to who ever He likes at the time He wants it. Let them understand that this is the governors time and no person on earth can change the wish of God.

The governor and his party are both for the winners and the losers. To build the state is a collective responsibility. Nobody from outside will do it for us. I want to appeal to aggrieved members to join hands with us in building the state. We want to make the state strong both socially and economically. We can only suceed if we are united and support one another.

Here’s how ECOWAS ended up with a War Chest of $US252million (3)…

0

Accidental ECOWAS & AU Citizen: Here’s how ECOWAS ended up with a War Chest of $US252million (3), and How the African Integration narrative is far from over!

By E.K.Bensah Jr

Last week, I touched on proposals for innovative financing paths; the case of ECCAS and its levy on imports; the case of UEMOA/CEMAC; and the case of ECOWAS.

On the proposals, you may re-call that a study by the AU commission had proposed no less than eight scenarios, which included (a) tax on imports; (b)tax on revenue from hydrocarbon exports; (c)tax on insurance premiums; (d)levy on airline tickets, but that the AU had proposed three, which are: : (i) levy on imports from the rest of the world; (ii)levy on airline tickets; and (iii)levy on insurance policies.

ECCAS has a levy, which it calls community contribution for integration (CCI), which is calculated as 0.4%. UEMOA’s levy rate is 1%, whereas ECOWAS’s is 0.5% of the value of goods imported from third countries. So far, so straightforward. The real story and one I hope has left one salivating long enough is how on earth ECOWAS ended up with a so-called ?war-chest? of 252million. If you know your figures for how much ECOWAS made between 2007 and 2009 from imports, it is not difficult at all to understand how between that period, it managed to bag that amount.

In ECOWAS, during 2007 and 2009, revenue from the Community levy amounted to US$230, 314 and 360 million respectively. In that same period, the approved budgets of ECOWAS institutions run to US$160, 220 and 274 million, respectively. This left a positive balance of US$72, 94 and 86 million, respectively.

It is clear that in the three years, ECOWAS achieved ?a cumulative positive balance of US$252million? and recorded in its books as carried forward earnings. This balance is what the AU’s ?Bulletin of Fridays of the Commission? considers a veritable ?war chest?, offering ECOWAS ?considerable leeway in implementing its mandate?. There are two significant things about this development. First, that while the world was going through the financial crisis in 2008, here was West Africa, through its innovative fund-raising mechanisms raising revenue and secondly, getting a surplus for good measure.

Levy on Insurance Policies and airline tickets: Africa Solidarity tax

Even after all this good news on financing African integration, the story is not quite over ? as exemplified by discussions on more levies. In this specific proposal, which is also known as ?a citizen tax?, the idea is to get this levy to involve ?all African citizens? through insurance subscriptions: automobile and real estate. Heath insurance is exempted.

The so-called ?solidarity tax? is so-named because most of the tax is supposed to come from G8 and G20, and can be applied to flights leaving Africa and with destinations in Africa; flights departing from Africa with destinations outside Africa, with the Commission of the African Union proposing US$2 for short distances, and US$5 for ling distances.

How Senegal innovatively-finances (integration)?and way forward?

Truth be told, ECOWAS member state Senegal has been doing this for a while. In the country, the tax applies only to flights departing from airports in the country. Collection of the levy is done through IATA for all airlines associated with it. At its monthly payment operations, IATA pays the share due Senegal into a bank account (escrow account) held with the BNP Paribas.

If we stop and reflect on this for a nano-second, can we really say we need to continue depending on donors, or is it perhaps not time to re-consider that fallacy of needing an ?aid-exit? plan to woo investors and so-called FDI? If we can get past this mindset ? and I believe the sub-region has the capacity to do so, as exemplified by my post last year where I expatiated on how instrumental the Ecowas Bank for Investment and Development has been ? then the sky will certainly offer itself as the proverbial limit on seed funding for continuing the narrative of African integration which continues to be written summit after summit.

AU summit: 23?30 January, 2012
Speaking of which, this week of 23 January is a great week for African integration as between 23 and 30 January, the AU hosts its 18th summit in the home of the AU, with the theme ?Boosting Intra-African Trade?.

Reports online indicate that although the main theme is intra-African trade, it will be a significant summit for the manner in which it will cover the following topics: Election of the Chairperson; the Deputy Chairperson and the other commissioners; the state of peace and security in Africa in relation to the North Africa Revolution; the issues of ?shared values?: good governance; elections and human rights; the humanitarian situation in Africa; the review protocol of the African Court of Justice and human rights; the future of the Pan-African Parliament; the way forward on the political transformation of the AU.

It goes without saying that this will be the first AU summit without Gaddafi, and also the first that will include the full participation of the new Libyan and Egyptian authorities. It remains an exciting time for the AU on account of the fact that the AU is no less than 10 years this September. No less than the Chinese President Hu Jintao will be in Addis to officially hand over the new gargantuan AU Headquarters to the African Heads of State.

In 2009, in his capacity as a ?Do More Talk Less Ambassador? of the 42nd Generation?an NGO that promotes and discusses Pan-Africanism–Emmanuel gave a series of lectures on the role of ECOWAS and the AU in facilitating a Pan-African identity. Emmanuel owns “Critiquing Regionalism” (http://critiquing-regionalism.org). Established in 2004 as an initiative to respond to the dearth of knowledge on global regional integration initiatives worldwide, this non-profit blog features regional integration initiatives on MERCOSUR/EU/Africa/Asia and many others. You can reach him on [email protected] / Mobile: +233-268.687.653.

Articles by Emmanuel K. Bensah Jr.

I Address The Root Of Nigeria And All Who Water Its Evil.

2

I come to you, Nigeria and Nigerians, in the name of Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen. I stand here today as a slave, made from nothing, and then created by God through His Word, Jesus the Christ. I’ve gone through my own faults, Oh Lord, as your servant in search of your best. I’m a child of the Creator of the best things; this I know better. I come to you today, my people, because we are all one in God. But we must never forget from whence our light comes; it is from God. Darkness is the nature of the earth because the enemy was thrown down to earth before we came here, even when we have always been in the Father through His Word and by His Spirit. God, in his humble awesomeness, has purposed that, no matter how satan tries, he will never alter the Word of our great King, Jesus. He is the Son and The Father; He is Equal and One with Godhead. Yet He is The Son. I have come, no more as a servant, but as a son and an heir with Christ. I live, everyday, in the consciousness of my love for Him and His immeasurable love for me, His own. I remember The Blood – this blood that speaks better things than that of innocent Abel. Jesus Christ is a free gift to all men; have Him and have life, refuse him and keep on kicking against the goad. The Word of God stands eternally sure. This Blood he shared on the cross of Calvary and His resurrection made all things new. So is anyone in Christ ? new and free. He’s become my all round shield, provision and keeping. Yes, I come to you all today with the full authority of a Prince who has come of age in the house of his eternally loving father, and has understood that great responsibility is great honor. When my Lord Jesus will put on me the golden crown with beautiful decorations and a name which shall be peculiar to me, my only prayer now is that His children will be numbered before the evil one comes. I shall work the work of my father now that is day, for my own time of glory is coming in a glorious way. Every pain and price has found its cleansing and payment in the blood of Jesus Christ. No man, therefore, is excusable.

In heaven, the pain of losing someone is absent because, there, we have come to know the abundant love and justice of our great King. The people of the earth must know that Jesus Christ has paid for all, and is, he, being a man, yet the father of all, gave himself in love to bring us, as lost sheep, back to our great father through the sacrifice of his blood?dripping blood of man, yet God of all. He has paid every price for me and no other forces shall stand in opposition to His dominion of love in me. He is God over me ? God and Father, yet we can only become one when we have accepted the lordship of Jesus Christ over our lives. My life is a life of beauty and glory because my eyes are gazed on the truth. I love the light that gave me ordination and the authority we have in Jesus Christ. I address the very root of Nigeria and the powers and peoples holding others bound under the pretext of unity in a name and abomination called Nigeria. I address specifically everything and everyone who has stood and is still standing against the realization of sovereign state of Biafra by any means and in any way – hidden or open. Your hour of judgment has come. And so I declare these to you:

1. Let every faulty foundation holding my people in Nigeria fall, and let men who have made themselves gods over others become things of shame before the eyes of the world and those in it.

2. For over fifty (50) years, my people have been in the wilderness in their own land. The Lord is judging satan over Nigeria; and he stands forever rebuked in the presence of our Lord. We escaped slavering in the hands of our taskmasters but jumped into having our neighbors and brothers as the very people who oppose us. The God of justice is opposing them. For decades my people have been turned into vagabonds; the best of bests became a sore sight?yet living. We have endured insults, shame, abuse, killing, injustice and hatred; we have endured everything. God has remembered His Word. And He is watching it to see a manifestation. It’s only by His grace that Ndigbo are alive today. Nigeria has used pogrom, murder, hunger, genocide, denial, marginalization, false-witnessing and provocations on us. They could not get us to renounce our God; now, they have started pogrom against us again? both in the North and in our land. God is speaking now for us ? for those who have been ignored by those who claim to champion peace, unity, progress and life. God is our all. That voice that speaks to that heart of a child’s keeps His people aware. Nations shall be grateful for the actualized Sovereign State of Biafra. Let the light of God, therefore, beam on and consume every principality, power and people opposing the freedom of Igbo in Nigeria. Everyone deserves the freedom that God, in His great love, has given all – mighty, low, rich, poor, healthy, weak, young or old and alive. There is no barrier in Christ Jesus because every man living in his place will forever live in peace.

3. From this day, every pillar holding Nigeria will begin to break down suddenly and steadily to the last. Igbo in Nigeria, a people set aside for God’s glory, has since the dishonest and wicked colonial Britain came with the pretext of freeing fellow men from the prisons of slavery into compelling them in the way of the antichrist. Now that the light still shines, every created thing must honor God’s Word from my mouth because I am a messenger and an heir. And my end is in Christ in glory, not in any other person or force. It is for the freedom of the people to go to the mountain and worship their God. No man born of a woman and no force from the pit of hell which will ever stop the flow of the Spirit.

4. I declare that every state which has opposed and is still opposing the freedom of Biafra, the people of Zion, begin to opposite itself only to propose and beg us to take Israel and to go to the mountain of God to worship. They shall release our profits to us and we will never doubt. God is the same, yesterday, today and forever. Amen. If He did it before, He can and will do it again. Every state that supports, in every way, the manifestation of the Sovereign state of Biafra will experience mercy, but every thought or tongue that opposes our peace shall writhe under the perpetually consuming fire.

5. This time, our people, the Lord’s flock, shall go, and in peace. The fire and the cloud shall lead the way by the Spirit of God. The people of Biafra are now leaving. And we are leaving with the best of Nigeria; Nigeria and her people will be glad to beg us to take all. We shall be filled. Reasons for songs of joy shall abound also.

6. Those compelled outside of this nation of Biafra shall choose whether to accept their peace in Jesus Christ or remain in the dark. Yet we persuade; we do not force or induce because we know that the hope we have in Christ is eternal and sure. The spirit we have is from God Himself and we know His peace. In the wilderness we knew the comfort of His peace. Now is the hour of salvation and no power will ever be able to diminish the awesome power and glory of our focus, Jesus Christ.

8. In Biafra, the new nation, God’s word shall reign supreme. The fear of God shall be restored and we shall experience the graces in the blood of Jesus while we get ready for the coming day of Christ. No tree from the evil one shall be planted in our land, and no evil leader with the mind of Nigerian leaders at different level of leadership shall lead my people. God, who sent Moses, will also bring Joshua.

9. The purpose of God is to start a new breed that will remind everyone of God’s beauty. What we have been given is something Nigeria will never come into comprehension with. The foundation of Biafra shall be in selflessness; and it was. Now, every block which goes on top of it is already clean because the Word of God will be done here on earth as it is in heaven.

10. Those who have denied others of true justice, justice will be denied them in every area of their lives. And those who have stolen from the people bound under Nigeria, everything shall be stolen from you until you cry and make a release. Until and unless Nigerian political, religious and traditional leaders come together to dissolve, amicably, this abomination called Nigeria, fear shall grip young and old among those who reject the truth. Yet, time has been set.

11. The truth is that Nigeria has filled her cup with obvious charm and willingness. Now, the cup must pour so that the plantation of the Lord will stand out. Ignorance in the midst of knowledge is foolishness, and poverty in the midst of plenty is burden which those ready and willing will be rid of. Those who kill and destroy shall be killed and destroyed; those who go about with the spirit of the antichrist killing and destroying lives ? shall face the swift judgment. They have claimed to bring peace but all they give is war and destruction; therefore, their land shall know no peace. The blood-spilling, marginalization, slavery and shame of Ndigbo carried out to this date by the Nigerian government and Nigerians must stop forthwith. Boko Haram kills my people and kills those who gather to burry the ones they have previously killed. Yet the government says ?do not panic.? Boko Haram, with all the help they have got so far, has eternally destroyed the rights to One-Nigeria where Igbo remain the sacrificial lamb. The Unions and human right groups have condemned subsidy but have never been honest enough to speak up against these blatant marginalization and slavery of Igbo in their land. Those who cry ?One Nigeria!? shall have voices drown them to silence, and those who have illegally stashed Nigeria’s money in different accounts and countries of the world shall vomit them without further delay and in the presence of all.

12. Everyone standing in the way of dissolving Nigeria shall be resisted even by the air man breathes and all who oppose the actualization of Biafra and the freedom of other compelled people of Nigeria shall be oppose by the ground itself. Whoever works for the killing and destruction of Igbo and Christians in what was, until now, called one-Nigeria, will be scared of his/her own sleep as everything has begun to work against him/her in every way. Those who receive billions of Naira as salaries will receive billions of sorrows and must vomit all they have stolen they and their people.

I condole with those affected as these things affect me. The only true loss is that of the soul which left without Jesus Christ; those who died in Christ are in peace. I plead with our leaders in the Southeast ? political, religious, and traditional – to have one voice which concedes with the truth of the now ? the reality, advantage, and inevitability of the realization of the sovereign state of Biafra. I demand that they bring the matter of Igbo in Nigeria to anywhere and everywhere human justice may be found in the world. I do these so that no one will be so blind and stubborn that he casts himself out. Let those who seek to keep others bound be forever bound, and let those whose cases have slept in God’s presence receive their answers. Everyone, from the presidency, through ward councilors, to the common man, who seats on peoples’ rights and freedom, is bound under God to release the peace of the people or perish on that seat. I pray for the peace of Jerusalem; may they find peace who love you. I have decreed and declared these in the name of Jesus Christ, my Lord and savior – the Lord and savior of all. Amen. Nigeria is kicking against the rock and has utterly broken. Enough is enough!

By Ikechukwu Enyiagu, [email protected]

By: Ikechukwu Enyiagu.

Martin Amidu was wise not to resign

0

([email protected]
Following a press release issued by the then Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Martin Amidu, on 12th January, 2012, some commentators, even outside the NDC Government, felt that he had made his position untenable within the Government and should resign.

Others pressed him to give the name of his fellow Cabinet member who, he said, perceived that his integrity and professionalism as a lawyer ‘was a threat to the concealment of gargantuan crimes against the people of Ghana in which they might be implicated.’

I felt it was improper to put pressure on him to mention the name, as it might be impracticable for him to do so at this time. As it turned out, the Attorney-General and Minister of Justice did not resign, but President Atta Mills dismissed him on 19th January 2012. I felt sad about the dismissal.

I was disappointed but not surprised that members of the NDC Government were vocal in calling for Martin Amidu’s resignation. No wonder that in the press release, he had called members of a communication team of the NDC young and inexperienced.

To me, if they were not, they would have considered that a response to the press release required ‘cool heads’, as Martin Amidu had mentioned in the press release, and calm and soul searching by the Government as a team, including the President.

This did not happen, as is shown in the reason given in the dismissal letter. I will return to that later.

I would be surprised if Martin Amidu’s press release had come out of the blue, as far as the NDC Government is concerned. As he was courageous to issue the press release, particularly in the light of threats to his life, as he stated in it, I feel that Ghanaians should commend him and should not press him too hard to give the name.

After all, it was obvious to many people the person he had in mind. He must have raised this matter within the NDC and Government structures but not got anywhere. It is up to the people of Ghana not to miss this lifeline thrown by him to save the sinking ship which is the nation itself.

It is significant that, after Martin Amidu had issued the press release on 12th January 2012, despite the threat to his life, as he had said, he was in court in person on 16th January 2012, amongst other things, to pray the court to place an order of refund of the GH?51m judgement debt paid to Alfred Woyome.

The case was adjourned to 14th February 2012. One other issue is that there is a missing link between the time the Attorney-General and Minister of Justice instituted the court case and the date the President dismissed him for misconduct. It is important to find that missing link as the President claims not to have known about the payment.

As pointed out earlier, members of the NDC Government were naturally vocal in calling for Martin Amidu’s resignation. Surprisingly, similar calls were made from some leading politicians outside the NDC. But I was disappointed when the Ghana Bar Association said the President could not be faulted in any way for terminating his appointment.

?
‘According to the GBA, by the provisions of the constitution, the President reserves the right to fire any member of the government with or without convincing reasons? If the President’s view is that the Minister was rude to him and he wants to fire him, then the President is well within his right to go ahead and terminate his appointment.’ – Ghanaweb 20th January 2012.

When I read this, I asked myself why the GBA took this narrow view of the matter and based its position on the technicality or the process and not the substance. I wondered whether the GBA was politicised. I felt that, in matters of state such as this, the GBA would take a position based on what was lawful and good for the country. Sadly, to me, the GBA has misplaced the national interest in this case.

According to the GBA, the President has the prerogative to fire any member of his government without giving reasons. In the present case, as he has chosen to give a reason for his decision, I feel Ghanaians need to go behind the veil to look for the facts that gave rise to that reason.

The reason was contained in a terse statement from the Castle, which read: ‘The decision is as a result of Mr. Martin Amidu’s misconduct at a meeting last Friday, January 13th, 2012, presided over by His Excellency President J.E.A. Mills. Mr. Amidu’s conduct is incompatible with acceptable standards expected of Ministers and appointees of the President.’

According to reports, the President demanded proof of the allegations Martin Amidu made in the press release or a resignation letter from him without which he would be sacked. The President gave him the opportunity to substantiate the allegations he made against colleague ministers but he failed to do so.

This sounds childish to me. Did the President ask Martin Amidu to substantiate the allegations and give the name of the Minister concerned at the same meeting, that is, in front of his colleagues who attended the meeting, which might have included the Minister he had in mind? If so, it sounds like mob rule.

We all know that, if your subordinate is aggrieved and makes allegations against his colleagues, you do not call the person to substantiate the allegations and give names in front of those colleagues. You call the person on the quiet and have a word with him or her. We do it all the time, as parents, teachers and managers.

The NDC Government has an explanation to give here and tell us all the facts, otherwise I am afraid I would question whether the President genuinely wanted to deal with the matter properly.

We must not lose sight of the fact that in the 2000 election, the then presidential candidate, Professor Atta Mills selected this same Martin Amidu as his running mate. If President Atta Mills now finds him to be a man of misconduct, what would have happened if he had won the election in 2000 with him as his Vice-President?

Ghanaians do not deserve this incompetence. I hope Martin Amidu’s dismissal does not mean that the substance of the matter he raised in the press release and the subject matter of his appearance in court on 16th January 2012 are buried.

Since the Castle issued the dismissal letter last week, many people have said how disappointed they are in the President. One person who posted an article on Ghanaweb said he travelled to Ghana to vote for then candidate Atta Mills in the 2008 elections, thinking that he was the man to be believed, when he said he would work hard to fight bribery and corruption.

Now he is utterly disappointed. In a news item also posted on Ghanaweb on 20th January 2012, Hon. Paul Collins Appiah Ofori, MP for Asikuma Odoben Brakwa in the Central Region, was quoted as having described the dismissal of the Attorney-General and Minister of Justice as shameful.

He revealed that ‘? his trust in President Mills nearly created a brawl between him and his party (NPP) but has now realised Mills is a man of no integrity. ‘My support for President Mills when he was in opposition created a problem for me. My party pursued me for praising Mills for his genuineness and I expected much sincerity from him, but when he became President, the worst form of corruption has happened. ‘In fact, Mills has disgraced all of us from the central region, his family and Ghanaians because he aids fraud and corruption in the country.’

People are increasingly having doubt on the competence of the President. There have been the big headlines such as the STX housing deal, the judgement debt paid to Alfred Woyome, arrogance and insults by Ministers, and now the dismissal of the Attorney-General and Minister of Justice.

There are also pieces of information that filter through. Recently, a junior member of the Government or an NDC functionary accused some Ministers of dragging the President to launch projects that they well knew would not take off the ground.

Early this year, the Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, Albert Kan Dapaah, complained that action was not taken on reports issued by the PAC and an independent body might have to be set up to oversee implementation of recommendations made by the PAC.

To me, this gives credence to the belief that President Atta Mills is not his own man at the Castle. I ask myself: ‘How long are we going to wait for this incompetence to continue?’ Maybe the election scheduled for 7th December 2012 will come sooner.

By: Ghanaian Chronicle.

President Obamah’s State of the Union Address – Has Ghana Anything to Learn From It To Accelerate Our Development through Job Creation and reduce Unemployment?

0

Here is the State of the Union speech as prepared for delivery by President Barack Obama on Tuesday night before a joint session of Congress:

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:

Last month, I went to Andrews Air Force Base and welcomed home some of our last troops to serve in Iraq. Together, we offered a final, proud salute to the colors under which more than a million of our fellow citizens fought ? and several thousand gave their lives.

We gather tonight knowing that this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world. For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq. For the first time in two decades, Osama bin Laden is not a threat to this country. Most of al Qaeda’s top lieutenants have been defeated. The Taliban’s momentum has been broken, and some troops in Afghanistan have begun to come home.

These achievements are a testament to the courage, selflessness, and teamwork of America’s Armed Forces. At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations. They’re not consumed with personal ambition. They don’t obsess over their differences. They focus on the mission at hand. They work together.

Imagine what we could accomplish if we followed their example. Think about the America within our reach: A country that leads the world in educating its people. An America that attracts a new generation of high-tech manufacturing and high-paying jobs. A future where we’re in control of our own energy, and our security and prosperity aren’t so tied to unstable parts of the world. An economy built to last, where hard work pays off, and responsibility is rewarded.

We can do this. I know we can, because we’ve done it before. At the end of World War II, when another generation of heroes returned home from combat, they built the strongest economy and middle class the world has ever known. My grandfather, a veteran of Patton’s Army, got the chance to go to college on the GI Bill. My grandmother, who worked on a bomber assembly line, was part of a workforce that turned out the best products on Earth.

The two of them shared the optimism of a Nation that had triumphed over a depression and fascism. They understood they were part of something larger; that they were contributing to a story of success that every American had a chance to share ? the basic American promise that if you worked hard, you could do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, and put a little away for retirement.

‘Defining issue of our time’
The defining issue of our time is how to keep that promise alive. No challenge is more urgent. No debate is more important. We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by. Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules. What’s at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values, but American values. We have to reclaim them.

Let’s remember how we got here. Long before the recession, jobs and manufacturing began leaving our shores. Technology made businesses more efficient, but also made some jobs obsolete. Folks at the top saw their incomes rise like never before, but most hardworking Americans struggled with costs that were growing, paychecks that weren’t, and personal debt that kept piling up.

In 2008, the house of cards collapsed. We learned that mortgages had been sold to people who couldn’t afford or understand them. Banks had made huge bets and bonuses with other people’s money. Regulators had looked the other way, or didn’t have the authority to stop the bad behavior.

It was wrong. It was irresponsible. And it plunged our economy into a crisis that put millions out of work, saddled us with more debt, and left innocent, hard-working Americans holding the bag. In the six months before I took office, we lost nearly four million jobs. And we lost another four million before our policies were in full effect.

Those are the facts. But so are these. In the last 22 months, businesses have created more than three million jobs. Last year, they created the most jobs since 2005. American manufacturers are hiring again, creating jobs for the first time since the late 1990s. Together, we’ve agreed to cut the deficit by more than $2 trillion. And we’ve put in place new rules to hold Wall Street accountable, so a crisis like that never happens again.

The state of our Union is getting stronger. And we’ve come too far to turn back now. As long as I’m President, I will work with anyone in this chamber to build on this momentum. But I intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place.

The president calls opportunity for all the “defining issue of our time” in his State of the Union Address.

No, we will not go back to an economy weakened by outsourcing, bad debt, and phony financial profits. Tonight, I want to speak about how we move forward, and lay out a blueprint for an economy that’s built to last ? an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values.

Focus on manufacturing
This blueprint begins with American manufacturing.

On the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse. Some even said we should let it die. With a million jobs at stake, I refused to let that happen. In exchange for help, we demanded responsibility. We got workers and automakers to settle their differences. We got the industry to retool and restructure. Today, General Motors is back on top as the world’s number one automaker. Chrysler has grown faster in the U.S. than any major car company. Ford is investing billions in U.S. plants and factories. And together, the entire industry added nearly 160,000 jobs.

We bet on American workers. We bet on American ingenuity. And tonight, the American auto industry is back.

What’s happening in Detroit can happen in other industries. It can happen in Cleveland and Pittsburgh and Raleigh. We can’t bring back every job that’s left our shores. But right now, it’s getting more expensive to do business in places like China. Meanwhile, America is more productive. A few weeks ago, the CEO of Master Lock told me that it now makes business sense for him to bring jobs back home. Today, for the first time in fifteen years, Master Lock’s unionized plant in Milwaukee is running at full capacity.

So we have a huge opportunity, at this moment, to bring manufacturing back. But we have to seize it. Tonight, my message to business leaders is simple: Ask yourselves what you can do to bring jobs back to your country, and your country will do everything we can to help you succeed.

We should start with our tax code. Right now, companies get tax breaks for moving jobs and profits overseas. Meanwhile, companies that choose to stay in America get hit with one of the highest tax rates in the world. It makes no sense, and everyone knows it.

So let’s change it. First, if you’re a business that wants to outsource jobs, you shouldn’t get a tax deduction for doing it. That money should be used to cover moving expenses for companies like Master Lock that decide to bring jobs home.

Basic minimum tax
Second, no American company should be able to avoid paying its fair share of taxes by moving jobs and profits overseas. From now on, every multinational company should have to pay a basic minimum tax. And every penny should go towards lowering taxes for companies that choose to stay here and hire here.

Third, if you’re an American manufacturer, you should get a bigger tax cut. If you’re a high-tech manufacturer, we should double the tax deduction you get for making products here. And if you want to relocate in a community that was hit hard when a factory left town, you should get help financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers.

My message is simple. It’s time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America. Send me these tax reforms, and I’ll sign them right away.

The president calls for lower taxes on lower-income wage earners but asks for wealthier taxpayers to pay more.

We’re also making it easier for American businesses to sell products all over the world. Two years ago, I set a goal of doubling U.S. exports over five years. With the bipartisan trade agreements I signed into law, we are on track to meet that goal ? ahead of schedule. Soon, there will be millions of new customers for American goods in Panama, Colombia, and South Korea. Soon, there will be new cars on the streets of Seoul imported from Detroit, and Toledo, and Chicago.

I will go anywhere in the world to open new markets for American products. And I will not stand by when our competitors don’t play by the rules. We’ve brought trade cases against China at nearly twice the rate as the last administration ? and it’s made a difference. Over a thousand Americans are working today because we stopped a surge in Chinese tires. But we need to do more. It’s not right when another country lets our movies, music, and software be pirated. It’s not fair when foreign manufacturers have a leg up on ours only because they’re heavily subsidized.

Tonight, I’m announcing the creation of a Trade Enforcement Unit that will be charged with investigating unfair trade practices in countries like China. There will be more inspections to prevent counterfeit or unsafe goods from crossing our borders. And this Congress should make sure that no foreign company has an advantage over American manufacturing when it comes to accessing finance or new markets like Russia. Our workers are the most productive on Earth, and if the playing field is level, I promise you ? America will always win.

I also hear from many business leaders who want to hire in the United States but can’t find workers with the right skills. Growing industries in science and technology have twice as many openings as we have workers who can do the job. Think about that ? openings at a time when millions of Americans are looking for work.

That’s inexcusable. And we know how to fix it.
Commitment to training
Jackie Bray is a single mom from North Carolina who was laid off from her job as a mechanic. Then Siemens opened a gas turbine factory in Charlotte, and formed a partnership with Central Piedmont Community College. The company helped the college design courses in laser and robotics training. It paid Jackie’s tuition, then hired her to help operate their plant.

I want every American looking for work to have the same opportunity as Jackie did. Join me in a national commitment to train two million Americans with skills that will lead directly to a job. My Administration has already lined up more companies that want to help. Model partnerships between businesses like Siemens and community colleges in places like Charlotte, Orlando, and Louisville are up and running. Now you need to give more community colleges the resources they need to become community career centers ? places that teach people skills that local businesses are looking for right now, from data management to high-tech manufacturing.

And I want to cut through the maze of confusing training programs, so that from now on, people like Jackie have one program, one website, and one place to go for all the information and help they need. It’s time to turn our unemployment system into a reemployment system that puts people to work.

These reforms will help people get jobs that are open today. But to prepare for the jobs of tomorrow, our commitment to skills and education has to start earlier.

For less than one percent of what our Nation spends on education each year, we’ve convinced nearly every State in the country to raise their standards for teaching and learning ? the first time that’s happened in a generation.

But challenges remain. And we know how to solve them.

‘Teachers matter’
At a time when other countries are doubling down on education, tight budgets have forced States to lay off thousands of teachers. We know a good teacher can increase the lifetime income of a classroom by over $250,000. A great teacher can offer an escape from poverty to the child who dreams beyond his circumstance. Every person in this chamber can point to a teacher who changed the trajectory of their lives. Most teachers work tirelessly, with modest pay, sometimes digging into their own pocket for school supplies ? just to make a difference.

Teachers matter. So instead of bashing them, or defending the status quo, let’s offer schools a deal. Give them the resources to keep good teachers on the job, and reward the best ones. In return, grant schools flexibility: To teach with creativity and passion; to stop teaching to the test; and to replace teachers who just aren’t helping kids learn.

We also know that when students aren’t allowed to walk away from their education, more of them walk the stage to get their diploma. So tonight, I call on every State to require that all students stay in high school until they graduate or turn eighteen.

When kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge can be the cost of college. At a time when Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt, this Congress needs to stop the interest rates on student loans from doubling in July. Extend the tuition tax credit we started that saves middle-class families thousands of dollars. And give more young people the chance to earn their way through college by doubling the number of work-study jobs in the next five years.

Of course, it’s not enough for us to increase student aid. We can’t just keep subsidizing skyrocketing tuition; we’ll run out of money. States also need to do their part, by making higher education a higher priority in their budgets. And colleges and universities have to do their part by working to keep costs down. Recently, I spoke with a group of college presidents who’ve done just that. Some schools re-design courses to help students finish more quickly. Some use better technology. The point is, it’s possible. So let me put colleges and universities on notice: If you can’t stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down. Higher education can’t be a luxury ? it’s an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.

Let’s also remember that hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge: The fact that they aren’t yet American citizens. Many were brought here as small children, are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of deportation. Others came more recently, to study business and science and engineering, but as soon as they get their degree, we send them home to invent new products and create new jobs somewhere else.

That doesn’t make sense.
‘Take on illegal immigration’
I believe as strongly as ever that we should take on illegal immigration. That’s why my Administration has put more boots on the border than ever before. That’s why there are fewer illegal crossings than when I took office.

The opponents of action are out of excuses. We should be working on comprehensive immigration reform right now. But if election-year politics keeps Congress from acting on a comprehensive plan, let’s at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people who want to staff our labs, start new businesses, and defend this country. Send me a law that gives them the chance to earn their citizenship. I will sign it right away.

You see, an economy built to last is one where we encourage the talent and ingenuity of every person in this country. That means women should earn equal pay for equal work. It means we should support everyone who’s willing to work; and every risk-taker and entrepreneur who aspires to become the next Steve Jobs.

Obama draws contrast with GOP on immigration

After all, innovation is what America has always been about. Most new jobs are created in start-ups and small businesses. So let’s pass an agenda that helps them succeed. Tear down regulations that prevent aspiring entrepreneurs from getting the financing to grow. Expand tax relief to small businesses that are raising wages and creating good jobs. Both parties agree on these ideas. So put them in a bill, and get it on my desk this year. Today, the discoveries taking place in our federally-financed labs and universities could lead to new treatments that kill cancer cells but leave healthy ones untouched. New lightweight vests for cops and soldiers that can stop any bullet. Don’t gut these investments in our budget. Don’t let other countries win the race for the future. Support the same kind of research and innovation that led to the computer chip and the Internet; to new American jobs and new American industries.

Nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American-made energy. Over the last three years, we’ve opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration, and tonight, I’m directing my Administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources. Right now, American oil production is the highest that it’s been in eight years. That’s right ? eight years. Not only that ? last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years.

But with only 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves, oil isn’t enough. This country needs an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy ? a strategy that’s cleaner, cheaper, and full of new jobs.

We have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly one hundred years, and my Administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy. Experts believe this will support more than 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade. And I’m requiring all companies that drill for gas on public lands to disclose the chemicals they use. America will develop this resource without putting the health and safety of our citizens at risk.

t
The development of natural gas will create jobs and power trucks and factories that are cleaner and cheaper, proving that we don’t have to choose between our environment and our economy. And by the way, it was public research dollars, over the course of thirty years, that helped develop the technologies to extract all this natural gas out of shale rock ? reminding us that Government support is critical in helping businesses get new energy ideas off the ground.

Clean energy
What’s true for natural gas is true for clean energy. In three years, our partnership with the private sector has already positioned America to be the world’s leading manufacturer of high-tech batteries. Because of federal investments, renewable energy use has nearly doubled. And thousands of Americans have jobs because of it.

When Bryan Ritterby was laid off from his job making furniture, he said he worried that at 55, no one would give him a second chance. But he found work at Energetx, a wind turbine manufacturer in Michigan. Before the recession, the factory only made luxury yachts. Today, it’s hiring workers like Bryan, who said, ?I’m proud to be working in the industry of the future.?

Our experience with shale gas shows us that the payoffs on these public investments don’t always come right away. Some technologies don’t pan out; some companies fail. But I will not walk away from the promise of clean energy. I will not walk away from workers like Bryan. I will not cede the wind or solar or battery industry to China or Germany because we refuse to make the same commitment here. We have subsidized oil companies for a century. That’s long enough. It’s time to end the taxpayer giveaways to an industry that’s rarely been more profitable, and double-down on a clean energy industry that’s never been more promising. Pass clean energy tax credits and create these jobs.

Obama stands by energy initiatives amid GOP criticism

We can also spur energy innovation with new incentives. The differences in this chamber may be too deep right now to pass a comprehensive plan to fight climate change. But there’s no reason why Congress shouldn’t at least set a clean energy standard that creates a market for innovation. So far, you haven’t acted. Well tonight, I will. I’m directing my Administration to allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes. And I’m proud to announce that the Department of Defense, the world’s largest consumer of energy, will make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history ? with the Navy purchasing enough capacity to power a quarter of a million homes a year.

Of course, the easiest way to save money is to waste less energy. So here’s another proposal: Help manufacturers eliminate energy waste in their factories and give businesses incentives to upgrade their buildings. Their energy bills will be $100 billion lower over the next decade, and America will have less pollution, more manufacturing, and more jobs for construction workers who need them. Send me a bill that creates these jobs.

Building this new energy future should be just one part of a broader agenda to repair America’s infrastructure. So much of America needs to be rebuilt. We’ve got crumbling roads and bridges. A power grid that wastes too much energy. An incomplete high-speed broadband network that prevents a small business owner in rural America from selling her products all over the world.

Construction project red tape
During the Great Depression, America built the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge. After World War II, we connected our States with a system of highways. Democratic and Republican administrations invested in great projects that benefited everybody, from the workers who built them to the businesses that still use them today.

In the next few weeks, I will sign an Executive Order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects. But you need to fund these projects. Take the money we’re no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, and use the rest to do some nation-building right here at home.

t
There’s never been a better time to build, especially since the construction industry was one of the hardest-hit when the housing bubble burst. Of course, construction workers weren’t the only ones hurt. So were millions of innocent Americans who’ve seen their home values decline . And while Government can’t fix the problem on its own, responsible homeowners shouldn’t have to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom to get some relief.

Obama: Millionaires should pay at least 30 percent in taxes

That’s why I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks. A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won’t add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.

Let’s never forget: Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a Government and a financial system that do the same. It’s time to apply the same rules from top to bottom: No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts. An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody.

We’ve all paid the price for lenders who sold mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them, and buyers who knew they couldn’t afford them. That’s why we need smart regulations to prevent irresponsible behavior. Rules to prevent financial fraud, or toxic dumping, or faulty medical devices, don’t destroy the free market. They make the free market work better.

Obama lays out economic blueprint

There is no question that some regulations are outdated, unnecessary, or too costly. In fact, I’ve approved fewer regulations in the first three years of my presidency than my Republican predecessor did in his. I’ve ordered every federal agency to eliminate rules that don’t make sense. We’ve already announced over 500 reforms, and just a fraction of them will save business and citizens more than $10 billion over the next five years. We got rid of one rule from 40 years ago that could have forced some dairy farmers to spend $10,000 a year proving that they could contain a spill ? because milk was somehow classified as an oil. With a rule like that, I guess it was worth crying over spilled milk.

I’m confident a farmer can contain a milk spill without a federal agency looking over his shoulder. But I will not back down from making sure an oil company can contain the kind of oil spill we saw in the Gulf two years ago. I will not back down from protecting our kids from mercury pollution, or making sure that our food is safe and our water is clean. I will not go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to cancel your policy, deny you coverage, or charge women differently from men.

Wall Street rules
And I will not go back to the days when Wall Street was allowed to play by its own set of rules. The new rules we passed restore what should be any financial system’s core purpose: Getting funding to entrepreneurs with the best ideas, and getting loans to responsible families who want to buy a home, start a business, or send a kid to college.

So if you’re a big bank or financial institution, you are no longer allowed to make risky bets with your customers’ deposits. You’re required to write out a ?living will? that details exactly how you’ll pay the bills if you fail ? because the rest of us aren’t bailing you out ever again. And if you’re a mortgage lender or a payday lender or a credit card company, the days of signing people up for products they can’t afford with confusing forms and deceptive practices are over. Today, American consumers finally have a watchdog in Richard Cordray with one job: To look out for them.

t
We will also establish a Financial Crimes Unit of highly trained investigators to crack down on large-scale fraud and protect people’s investments. Some financial firms violate major anti-fraud laws because there’s no real penalty for being a repeat offender. That’s bad for consumers, and it’s bad for the vast majority of bankers and financial service professionals who do the right thing. So pass legislation that makes the penalties for fraud count.

And tonight, I am asking my Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans.

A return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility will help us protect our people and our economy. But it should also guide us as we look to pay down our debt and invest in our future.

Right now, our most immediate priority is stopping a tax hike on 160 million working Americans while the recovery is still fragile. People cannot afford losing $40 out of each paycheck this year. There are plenty of ways to get this done. So let’s agree right here, right now: No side issues. No drama. Pass the payroll tax cut without delay.

When it comes to the deficit, we’ve already agreed to more than $2 trillion in cuts and savings. But we need to do more, and that means making choices. Right now, we’re poised to spend nearly $1 trillion more on what was supposed to be a temporary tax break for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. Right now, because of loopholes and shelters in the tax code, a quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle-class households. Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary.

Do we want to keep these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans? Or do we want to keep our investments in everything else ? like education and medical research; a strong military and care for our veterans? Because if we’re serious about paying down our debt, we can’t do both.

The American people know what the right choice is. So do I. As I told the Speaker this summer, I’m prepared to make more reforms that rein in the long term costs of Medicare and Medicaid, and strengthen Social Security, so long as those programs remain a guarantee of security for seniors.

But in return, we need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of Members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes. Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule: If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes. And my Republican friend Tom Coburn is right: Washington should stop subsidizing millionaires. In fact, if you’re earning a million dollars a year, you shouldn’t get special tax subsidies or deductions. On the other hand, if you make under $250,000 a year, like 98 percent of American families, your taxes shouldn’t go up. You’re the ones struggling with rising costs and stagnant wages. You’re the ones who need relief.

Now, you can call this class warfare all you want. But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes? Most Americans would call that common sense.

We don’t begrudge financial success in this country. We admire it. When Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, it’s not because they envy the rich. It’s because they understand that when I get tax breaks I don’t need and the country can’t afford, it either adds to the deficit, or somebody else has to make up the difference ? like a senior on a fixed income; or a student trying to get through school; or a family trying to make ends meet. That’s not right. Americans know it’s not right. They know that this generation’s success is only possible because past generations felt a responsibility to each other, and to their country’s future, and they know our way of life will only endure if we feel that same sense of shared responsibility. That’s how we’ll reduce our deficit. That’s an America built to last.

Washington gridlock
I recognize that people watching tonight have differing views about taxes and debt; energy and health care. But no matter what party they belong to, I bet most Americans are thinking the same thing right now: Nothing will get done this year, or next year, or maybe even the year after that, because Washington is broken.

Can you blame them for feeling a little cynical?

The greatest blow to confidence in our economy last year didn’t come from events beyond our control. It came from a debate in Washington over whether the United States would pay its bills or not. Who benefited from that fiasco?

I’ve talked tonight about the deficit of trust between Main Street and Wall Street. But the divide between this city and the rest of the country is at least as bad ? and it seems to get worse every year.

Obama: Debt ceiling fight contributed to poor economy

Some of this has to do with the corrosive influence of money in politics. So together, let’s take some steps to fix that. Send me a bill that bans insider trading by Members of Congress, and I will sign it tomorrow. Let’s limit any elected official from owning stocks in industries they impact. Let’s make sure people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress can’t lobby Congress, and vice versa ? an idea that has bipartisan support, at least outside of Washington.

Some of what’s broken has to do with the way Congress does its business these days. A simple majority is no longer enough to get anything ? even routine business ? passed through the Senate. Neither party has been blameless in these tactics. Now both parties should put an end to it. For starters, I ask the Senate to pass a rule that all judicial and public service nominations receive a simple up or down vote within 90 days.

The executive branch also needs to change. Too often, it’s inefficient, outdated and remote. That’s why I’ve asked this Congress to grant me the authority to consolidate the federal bureaucracy so that our Government is leaner, quicker, and more responsive to the needs of the American people.

Finally, none of these reforms can happen unless we also lower the temperature in this town. We need to end the notion that the two parties must be locked in a perpetual campaign of mutual destruction; that politics is about clinging to rigid ideologies instead of building consensus around common sense ideas.

In his State of the Union address, President Obama calls on leaders to work for a “smarter, more effective government.”

Smarter, more effective government’
I’m a Democrat. But I believe what Republican Abraham Lincoln believed: That Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more. That’s why my education reform offers more competition, and more control for schools and States. That’s why we’re getting rid of regulations that don’t work. That’s why our health care? law relies on a reformed private market, not a Government program.

On the other hand, even my Republican friends who complain the most about Government spending have supported federally-financed roads, and clean energy projects, and federal offices for the folks back home.

The point is, we should all want a smarter, more effective Government. And while we may not be able to bridge our biggest philosophical differences this year, we can make real progress. With or without this Congress, I will keep taking actions that help the economy grow. But I can do a whole lot more with your help. Because when we act together, there is nothing the United States of America can’t achieve.

That is the lesson we’ve learned from our actions abroad over the last few years.

Gay rights advocates hope for unlikely message from Obama

Ending the Iraq war has allowed us to strike decisive blows against our enemies. From Pakistan to Yemen, the al Qaeda operatives who remain are scrambling, knowing that they can’t escape the reach of the United States of America.

From this position of strength, we’ve begun to wind down the war in Afghanistan. Ten thousand of our troops have come home. Twenty-three thousand more will leave by the end of this summer. This transition to Afghan lead will continue, and we will build an enduring partnership with Afghanistan, so that it is never again a source of attacks against America.

As the tide of war recedes, a wave of change has washed across the Middle East and North Africa, from Tunis to Cairo; from Sana’a to Tripoli. A year ago, Qadhafi was one of the world’s longest-serving dictators ? a murderer with American blood on his hands. Today, he is gone. And in Syria, I have no doubt that the Assad regime will soon discover that the forces of change can’t be reversed, and that human dignity can’t be denied.

How this incredible transformation will end remains uncertain. But we have a huge stake in the outcome. And while it is ultimately up to the people of the region to decide their fate, we will advocate for those values that have served our own country so well. We will stand against violence and intimidation. We will stand for the rights and dignity of all human beings ? men and women; Christians, Muslims, and Jews. We will support policies

that lead to strong and stable democracies and open markets, because tyranny is no match for liberty.

Facing Iran
And we will safeguard America’s own security against those who threaten our citizens, our friends, and our interests. Look at Iran. Through the power of our diplomacy, a world that was once divided about how to deal with Iran’s nuclear program now stands as one. The regime is more isolated than ever before; its leaders are faced with crippling sanctions, and as long as they shirk their responsibilities, this pressure will not relent. Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal. But a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible, and far better, and if Iran changes course and meets its obligations, it can rejoin the community of nations.

The renewal of American leadership can be felt across the globe. Our oldest alliances in Europe and Asia are stronger than ever. Our ties to the Americas are deeper. Our iron-clad commitment to Israel’s security has meant the closest military cooperation between our two countries in history. We’ve made it clear that America is a Pacific power, and a new beginning in Burma has lit a new hope. From the coalitions we’ve built to secure nuclear materials, to the missions we’ve led against hunger and disease; from the blows we’ve dealt to our enemies; to the enduring power of our moral example, America is back.

Anyone who tells you otherwise, anyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesn’t know what they’re talking about. That’s not the message we get from leaders around the world, all of whom are eager to work with us. That’s not how people feel from Tokyo to Berlin; from Cape Town to Rio; where opinions of America are higher than they’ve been in years. Yes, the world is changing; no, we can’t control every event. But America remains the one indispensable nation in world affairs ? and as long as I’m President, I intend to keep it that way.

Obama lays out economic blueprint

That’s why, working with our military leaders, I have proposed a new defense strategy that ensures we maintain the finest military in the world, while saving nearly half a trillion dollars in our budget. To stay one step ahead of our adversaries, I have already sent this Congress legislation that will secure our country from the growing danger of cyber-threats.

Above all, our freedom endures because of the men and women in uniform who defend it. As they come home, we must serve them as well as they served us. That includes giving them the care and benefits they have earned ? which is why we’ve increased annual VA spending every year I’ve been President. And it means enlisting our veterans in the work of rebuilding our Nation.

With the bipartisan support of this Congress, we are providing new tax credits to companies that hire vets. Michelle and Jill Biden have worked with American businesses to secure a pledge of 135,000 jobs for veterans and their families. And tonight, I’m proposing a Veterans Job Corps that will help our communities hire veterans as cops and firefighters, so that America is as strong as those who defend her.

‘Learn from the service of our troops’
Which brings me back to where I began. Those of us who’ve been sent here to serve can learn from the service of our troops. When you put on that uniform, it doesn’t matter if you’re black or white; Asian or Latino; conservative or liberal; rich or poor; gay or straight. When you’re marching into battle, you look out for the person next to you, or the mission fails. When you’re in the thick of the fight, you rise or fall as one unit, serving one Nation, leaving no one behind.

One of my proudest possessions is the flag that the SEAL Team took with them on the mission to get bin Laden. On it are each of their names. Some may be Democrats. Some may be Republicans. But that doesn’t matter. Just like it didn’t matter that day in the Situation Room, when I sat next to Bob Gates ? a man who was George Bush’s defense secretary; and Hillary Clinton, a woman who ran against me for president.

All that mattered that day was the mission. No one thought about politics. No one thought about themselves. One of the young men involved in the raid later told me that he didn’t deserve credit for the mission. It only succeeded, he said, because every single member of that unit did their job ? the pilot who landed the helicopter that spun out of control; the translator who kept others from entering the compound; the troops who separated the women and children from the fight; the SEALs who charged up the stairs. More than that, the mission only succeeded because every member of that unit trusted each other ? because you can’t charge up those stairs, into darkness and danger, unless you know that there’s someone behind you, watching your back.

So it is with America. Each time I look at that flag, I’m reminded that our destiny is stitched together like those fifty stars and those thirteen stripes. No one built this country on their own. This Nation is great because we built it together. This Nation is great because we worked as a team. This Nation is great because we get each other’s backs. And if we hold fast to that truth, in this moment of trial, there is no challenge too great; no mission too hard. As long as we’re joined in common purpose, as long as we maintain our common resolve, our journey moves forward, our future is hopeful, and the state of our Union will always be strong.

Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

Source: MSNBC NEWS
Culled by Dr. Gabriel A. Ayisi

Articles by Gabriel Ayisi, Dr.

After Betty Mould-Iddrisu’s Resignation; what next?

0

The Minister of Education, Betty Mould-Iddrisu has resigned from office over developments associated with the Alfred Woyome judgment debt saga.

She presented her letter of resignation to the Office of the President Monday evening and the President has accepted the resignation.

A press statement signed by My Koku Anyidoho, Director of Communication at the Office of the President, on Tuesday said President Mills accepted Mrs Mould-Iddrisu’s resignation and thanked her for the ?services rendered to the people of Ghana during the period she served in Government, and wished her well?.

The former Education Minister thanked President Mills for the opportunity to serve in his administration and also insisted that ?she is resigning with a clear conscience and is confident any investigation will exonerate her,?

There were speculations last week she might speak publicly to defend her name after some party activists and supporters suggested she be sacked because she mishandled the affair while she was the chief legal officer of the state, with some going as far as claiming she might be complicit. The opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) also called for her head for failing to do due diligence in the matter.

Close associates of hers told yours truly that her decisions on the Woyome case had been based on what appeared sound counsel from legal brains and technocrats at the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning and elsewhere and that in due time she would tell the entire country what she knows about the case.

Betty Mould-Iddrisu was previously the Head of Legal and Constitutional Affairs of the Commonwealth Secretariat in London before she was made Ghana’s first ever woman Minister of Justice and Attorney General.

She becomes the second cabinet minister in the present administration to have lost her job over the Woyome judgment debt issue following closely on the heels of sacked Attorney General, Martin Amidu.

Amidu was last week dismissed from office shortly after the president issued an ultimatum for him to prove corrupt allegations against persons in the government or resign.

Hon. Betty Mould-Iddrisu’s resignation is an honorable one and the hallmark of any decent politician. She has done what millions of politicians not only in Ghana but around Africa finds very difficult to do. It takes a principled, courageous and honest person to resigns from his or her position.

Resignation in our part of the world is very rare. How many people have the gut and the courage to resigns their positions even when the odd is against them? I see Betty Mould-Iddrisu’s resignation as a mark of maturity, courage and inspiration.

It is also a mark of good leadership. I hope everyone who aspires to be a leader will learn from the actions of Madam Betty Mould-Idrrisu. At least President Mills didn’t send her to another ministry just to cover up her mistake or otherwise.

Ghanaians want to know the truth about this judgement debt saga and I hope her resignation will pave way for proper investigations and will also allow her more time to help EOCO unravel the truth.

Until then, people can put a spin on this, but I careless. Betty Mould-Iddrisu is a heroine in our generation and I hold her to high esteem.

Emmanuel Dela Coffie
www.delacoffie.wordpress.com

Disclaimer: “The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Modern Ghana. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). Modern Ghana will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.” ? Emmanuel Dela Coffie.

AN OPEN LETTER TO MODERN GHANA.COM

0

I have read several of the ravings and rantings of the so-called Professor Afrikazata Deku with great concern. I don’t know why Modern Ghana.com (editors) allows him to spew his poisonous, prejudicial, ethnocentric, and racist remarks in this medium. The Afro-centric professor has condemned himself for using the Internet, which was created by “the white man” that he hates with vengeance. My first question to the Prof is what universal language do we speak in Africa? How have both English and French made Africans slaves? Who are ruling African countries today? Who are responsible for the current corruption, greed, avarice, and self-promotion, and ineffective governance in Africa particularly, Ghana today? Do we blame the white man for our current economic woes, lack of infrastructure, electricity ration, and poor medical care, and facilities in Ghana?

I don’t know which planet the Professor lives. I would like to know where he got his educational training. From experience, I have observed that when some Africans encounter unpleasant treatment from a few Caucasians or whites in their sojourn in Western countries, they tend to form a general negative opinion and conclude that all Caucasians or Whites are evil. However, such a premise has one fundamental flaw. The fundamental flaw is that you do not judge a race of people by the conduct or behavior of a few people. I think this is the problem that the professor has. He suffers from illogical thinking and action.

I have another concern about the influence of the avowed hatred of the Professor for whites. I don’t know his line of work. However, if he is teaching in one of the reputable universities of Ghana then, he is sowing a cancerous seed of hatred and racial prejudice in the hearts and minds of the future leaders of Ghana. Education is meant to enlighten the mind and help students to harness and horn the latent talents and abilities in them so that they can make significant impact wherever the Lord places them. I am afraid that this Professor would undermine such potentials in our future leaders if he is not confronted to examine the harm and the seed of hatred that he is sowing in the minds of these impressionable students. I also pity his wife and kids if he is a married man with children. Evil begets evil and hatred begets hatred unless the Lord intervenes in the lives of the children, they will grow up to be like their father.

The Continent of Africa has much to contribute to the rest of the world. In the same vein the Western world has much to contribute to Africa. We were not created to live in isolation. Therefore, it doesn’t matter where one plants his/her life. We are interdependent human beings that should not allow the color of our skin to draw a wedge among us. However, I am afraid that professor Deku is fanning the flame of racial prejudice and hatred that if left unchecked will wreck a havoc in the not distant future. Therefore, I suggest that while we enjoy the freedom of the Press, Modern Ghana.com should exercise its judicious right to curtail or refuse to publish such misinformation and racial rantings of Professor Deku. If he has nothing positive to contribute to to the literary world of sound ideas that would make the world a better place then, his incessant and vilifying articles should not be published.

Thanks.
Kennedy Ahenkora Adarkwa, PhD.

By: Kennedy Adarkwa.

THE BODY OF CHRIST TODAY

0

?All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need. Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts, praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were been saved.? ? Acts 2:44 to 47

A critical probe of churches today, reveals many findings; which are not of the way the body of Christ should be. Why am I saying this? Most of the 21st century churches and their various congregation seem to miss the mark; thus the benchmark laid down by our Lord and master Jesus for his flock to follow.

It is really indeed heartbreaking the way some Churches are tending to customize Christianity to suit their own interest thus to precisely say to strive for these changes to a level where it reconcile with their personal ideologies in life. For many congregation, in these present times, the prefect Christian personality is portrayed as one who is involved in social as well as financial activities of the church and how much one can logically deduce meaning from the Bible; which obviously can lead to formulation of theories which are way out of line and off the actual meaning and inspiration the message carries. Most churches in modern times seem to be more conscious of what is allowed or not in the church based on their doctrines rather than proclaiming the gospel. And these are continuously increasing the chances of unwanted behaviors finding its way to the church.

Christian communities have a vital role to play in terms of shaping the morality level of the world. And when it comes to influence, the Christian communities should have the upper hand on ?the world? (as in the Biblical context ) but not the other way round. Is improper to see things as it is now; where for the sake of increasing a congregation’s number, some churches won’t mind turning a blind eye on certain critical issues in the church. Most Christians of late are sinning based on a popular saying, ?Christianity is all a matter of heart not appearance.? Before I even precede let me hasten to state that ?genuine? appearance counts in Christianity. An instance is the reason people convert to the Christian faith through a particular Christian’s lifestyle or one alienating him or herself from a Christian congregation based on the action or inaction of an individual.

Stakeholders of the Christian faith’s inability to address issues which concerns personalities such as high contributors to church confers is creating a bad image for the entire Christian community. This explains why people who are even shy to proclaim their faith as Christians outside the confinement of their church premises are made elders in their churches due to that individual’s financial, academic or social status. And no wonder certain conditions in a church make it hostile to poor people. There are so many people, who worship in a particular church for long period of years but are neglected, when they are in trouble, due to their poor financial status hence their genuine inability to contribute to church confers, as they are expected to by the church.

Due to these conditions in the body, people whom are not chastised for the sake of their social standing in the church feel untouchable in their churches. Some because of these have emerged as dictators of their various churches. And it is mostly some of these people that spearhead splitting up of churches. What hurts much about these split ups is that, these people who causes them because of their influence on the formal church they were in, create a band wagon effect in their church after the split in order to draw members from other churches instead of unbelievers of the faith.

To hit the nail on the head, all what Christians should remember is that many sacrifices have been made to bring the body of Christ this far. The growth of the Christian faith, which has strive this far is base on the watering by the blood of the holy lamb as well as that of the apostle of ancient time, need not be put into disrepute. We are not in any competition among ourselves neither are we in an exhibition of spiritual gifting to see who is the best nor is it our mission to pave another way other than the one of Christ but we rather have a cooperate responsibility to go into the world and reach out for the perishing and care for the dying. The timing is just right to reach out a helping hand to a neighbor and also let him know of the love of Christ for mankind without our personal interest attached.

This article was written by Dominic Osei Boakye in the Department of Economics in Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. Email ? [email protected]

By: Dominic Osei Boakye.

Is it necessary to make hay while the sun shines in corporate?

0

How true or meaningful, the popular idiom / proverb is ‘make hay while the sun shines’ in corporate? Do plants and animals also follow the above idiom in their life? The truth is that, all the life forms do follow the above proverb in letter and spirit. The habit of ‘make hay while the sun shines’ hence may be linked to the evolution of all life forms in nature.

The above phrase / statement is not just a quotable quote, but is one the fundamental evolutionary principles on which the fabric of life is woven.

All the plants in the right season, shed leaves, flush, flower and fruit in order to maximize the opportunity. Unless they sense the opportunity in advance, their survival, propagation and procreation may suffer.

The opportunistic and true pathogens do make ‘their’ hay while the sun shines. They also know to recognize the opportunity and use it appropriately.

If, we study the evolution of animal behaviour, we can understand that, nature has favoured all animals with suitable features to ‘use/maximize the opportunity’ fully. The colour advantage of predators, cheek pouch in monkeys and cud-chewing adaptation of herbivores are some of the examples of the ‘opportunity optimization’ ability provided by evolution to animals.

How different is the above behaviour of animals or plants from corporate man? The biological need is the compelling factor in all animals and plants to ‘make hay while the sun shines’. In the case of corporate man, it is not the biological need, but ‘selfish existential’ need only makes him display such behaviour.

When all animals and plants contain and connote a positive meaning for the above proverb in their life, some corporate men attribute negative and ‘mean’ meaning to it. Another important difference is that, the habit of ‘make hay while the sun shines’ is instinct dependent in animals and plants, but in corporate man, it code his corporate talent or smartness.

Other important difference is that, in all animals and plants the behaviour of ‘make hay while the sun shines’ is limited to their individual need, directed towards the opportunity and never meant to score over its fellow creature, be it plant or animal. But the corporate men always display such behaviour against their fellow being to out smart or outwit him in the corporate ecosystem. All animals and plants use their strength or self belief or innate ability to gain support from the above behaviour, but the corporate man, use his inability and inefficiency to support the above habit.

Make hay while the sun shines as you cannot make hay during a rainy day. Let the collective wisdom of your corporate prevail over self gratification.

Articles by S. Ranganathan, Dr.

BOKO HARAM: THE ENEMY WITHIN

0

Boko Haram say they have ”no problem with Jonathan” yet they are killing his people like flies, destabilising his country, bringing his government to it’s knees, destroying national unity and cohesion, waging a relentless religious and ethnic war against the state and committing genocide and ethnic cleansing against a section of the population.

These people, and those at the highest level of government and the society that secretly support and encourage them, are seised of the devil and there is no truth in them. They have come only to kill, steal and destroy. They and those they represent need to be crushed and exterminated like cockroaches. Like the Agagites and Canaanites of old they and their pagan gods need to be wiped out and removed from the face of the earth. They are the darkness that seeks the darkness-demons in human flesh that have no regard for human life and that delight in the shedding of innocent blood.

They are utterly evil and they have no place in God’s glorious light or in the land of the living. And make no mistake about it. Boko Haram and their secret backers, supporters and financers are everywhere. They are the enemy within. They are in our Armed Forces, our security agencies, our Central Bank, our intelligentsia, our government and our political elites. They are heartless vampires all. And in the name of God the Great, the Living God, the Lord of Hosts, the Glory of Israel and the Lion of the Tribe of Judah they shall be exposed and destroyed.

By: Femi Fani-Kayode.

NIGERIA’S BOKO HARA, LET SOUTHEAST GOVERNORS MEET

0

It is reported that the Southeastern states (Igbo states) governors are scheduled to meet in Enugu in a few days’ time in order to take a collective stand on the killings of their people, Igbo and other Christians in the Islamic North of Nigeria by the jihadist group Boko Haram. It is believed by many that this meeting will define this generation of Igbo leaders. One cannot help but wonder if the intended attendees see it that way because that is what it is. The meeting will be the most important of all the meetings that these leaders will ever hold. It will define the direction and the future of the Igbo nation. And everyone is eagerly waiting. Are the leaders going to fail the led? The next few days will tell. No one envies the position of these leaders at this very challenging period in their people’s history. Since the last several months every day that passes see hundreds of dead bodies of their people being transported back to Igbo land from the Islamic North part of Nigeria. This is not counting the deluge of millions of refugees pouring in from the same Islamic North of Nigeria. There are over 3 million stranded in Kano alone, waiting to be evacuated. Today’s Igbo leaders have their plates full and probably ill-equipped to deal with the present dilemma.

Why do we say they are ill-equipped? Because only forty years ago Igbo and other Biafrans got defeated in a genocidal Biafra War in which 3.1 million of their people perished. And like a people’s history is being recycled, every event of today is a sinister replay of all the sordid events of the 1960s that led to the Biafra ? Nigeria War. The decision to go to war in the 60s was quicker not because the magnitude of the atrocity was higher but because Igbo leaders then had not been defeated in war in the living memory. They sincerely believed they could take on the world and win especially as they knew they were fighting a just cause; self-defense and self-determination. But eventually they discovered the hard way that victory does not always go to the just. They found out that many times, especially in the world of yesterday, that in the real world cunning, lies and might were the most important assets. So they fought the Biafra War armed only with their belief in the justness of their cause and failed. With this in the background, any of us can easily guess what is going on in the minds of today’s Igbo leaders. Naturally no one likes to fail repeatedly especially when the future and wellbeing of an entire nation of over 50 million people are at stake.

Considering this bitter past of the people’s recent history it is not difficult to see why the terribleness of the situation is failing to elicit the urgent response from Igbo leaders as expected. Their reticence is almost understandable since they don’t want to make the same mistakes again, some people have argued. Those arguments of course can be appreciated since mistakes of this sort can be too costly and responsible leaders always weigh both short and long term effects of their actions. But a time comes when leaders that worth their salt must take their stand in every matter that concern their people. A time comes when making mistakes while acting to solve problems are better than inaction. And right now is that time in the life of the Igbo nation. The Igbo leaders of today as the custodians of the collective wishes of the people cannot afford to toy with this sacred duty of theirs at this time. They must meet and they must take decisions. They must speak the mind of their people to the world. This time calls for bold action. Every true leader knows that his greatest fear is not about mistakes and failure but it’s about not doing something when the situation requires and the people expect to hear what their leader has to say. The next question after asking about what happened has always been what does the leader, supervisor, manager, etc. say or do.

At this time in Igbo people’s history, when they are being killed and looted in their tens of thousands by the Islamic North of Nigeria the question on people’s lips is what does the Igbo leaders say. The leaders in answering the question must not only say something now but they must do something for this generation of their people and for those yet unborn. For the Igbo leaders this is the greatest moment of their lives. How do they want history to record them? This Igbo governors’ meeting of course is belated but must be convened. We hope that the meeting should be merely to formally declare what more than 98% of their people want to hear: The separation of their people and land from the Nigerian state? Anything short of that announcement will definitely be unacceptable and a letdown of Igbo people.

This moment does not call for any timid disposition, half-measures or sentiments from any Igbo leadership. This time calls for bold decisions and truth telling. Apologizing for being alive such as the one heard from Mike Udah, the Press Secretary of Peter Obi the Anambra State governor is demeaning and should be eschewed. The report has it that Mike is denying a story in the Nigerian Compass of January 23, 2012 which quoted Peter Obi as saying that ?Boko Haram may divide Nigeria, says Southeast Governors.? Peter Obi happens to be the leader of the Southeast Governors. Mr. Udah repeatedly denied that the governors did not make any reference to the breaking up of Nigeria. He almost made a fool of himself in his very pathetic efforts at self-denials. At the end of watching this undignified display of abject foolery by the Press Secretary many people began to ask the inevitable questions; who is this apology supposed to serve? Where does Igbo leaders’ allegiance lie? Whose interests are they serving? Is it those of the Islamic Northern interests or Igbo people’s interests?

Many people were therefore quick to conclude that if the Igbo governors did not mention the need to break up Nigeria as a result of the activities of the terrorist Islamic Boko Haram group against the Igbo and other Christians in Nigeria then they said nothing and cannot be taken serious. If the governors did not say that Nigeria should be broken up now because over 5 million Igbo lives have been unjustly killed by the Nigerian state and the intolerant Islamic religion of the North and West of Nigeria since 1945 till date, then they must have forgotten an important part of their message, and Mike Udah should have been grateful to the reporter who wrote the story for reminding them of the right things to say at this most important time in Igbo people’s history. He should have been especially grateful to Nigerian Compass for calling to the Southeast governors’ attention the reason why they were elected to be leaders over their people at this particular time. There could not have been a better time to tell the leaders that this is the time for their glory or damnation. What the governors do today on behalf of their people in this situation will define them forever. We hope they will do the right thing and help speedy up the dissolution of the unworkable Nigerian union and free their people forever. Let’s divide Nigeria today.

By: Osita Ebiem.

BOOK REVIEW: Title: Reforming Leadership in Africa

0

BOOK REVIEW

Title: Reforming Leadership in Africa

Author: J. William Addai

Publisher: Publishers Graphics Indiana, USA, 2009

Price: US$24.99 plus shipping

Reviewer: Kofi Akosah-Sarpong

Increasingly, leadership has emerged as a key factor in Africa’s progress. Bewildered leadership schemes have seen a good part of post-independent Africa sinking, some leading to horrible civil wars and state paralysis. Africa’s leadership jam reveals that African elites have not understood their environment in relation to Africa’s progress, especially how to draw leadership materials from within their raw cultural values. Nigerians, Kenyans, Guineans and Central Africans will tell you they have everything but leadership.

This acknowledgement was revived when I read Reforming Leadership in Africa, a contribution to the on-going discussions continent-wide for the need to appropriate Africa’s cultural values and institutions into Africa’s progress, as a matter of psychology, confidence, dignity and logic. Such appropriation will help the continent’s progress by fostering the required self-assurance considered necessary for progress. The schism in Africa’s leadership organization has come about because the ex-colonial structures have not been harmonized skillfully enough with Africa’s indigenous ones, especially in the on-going decentralization exercises and the talk of developing new leaders for tomorrow’s Africa.

The propaganda have been that the ex-colonial structures are generally thought to be superior (though wrongly) to that of Africa’s, not only by the ex-colonialists of yesteryears but also Africa’s elites of today. Visit African bureaucracies and you will shocked whether they operate on African soil ? the leadership organizational values (the nuances, for instance) are heavily non-African. The trick in resolving these contentious African leadership issues, argues the author, is to develop skills to appropriate the differences to bring out the best in Africa’s leadership potential. The author, an Ashanti himself, draws heavily from Ashanti traditional leadership values and institutions, which he describes as his ?research test tube,? to explain the leadership reforms Africa feverishly needs to drive its progress.

In his bold attempts to locate where the African leadership-progress inadequacies come from (that’s lack of Africa’s cultural inputs), it is easy to see where Africa’s developmental troubles come from ? leadership mired in the notorious authoritarian, individualistic Big Man Syndrome cooked in ex-colonial European systems against Africa’s traditional consensus building systems. If Africa’s development challenges are first and foremost leadership, then what value of leadership? Leadership that for historical and cultural reasons, flow from Africa’s innate traditional values, and simultaneously balanced with Africa’s ex-colonial heritage. The question is how African elites, as directors of progress, can draw from Africa’s cultural values to reform their trembling leadership tests today. And short of that; continue to suffer, as African leaders repeat the old mistakes that have disturbed them and their people’s progress.

Against the backdrop of global intercultural leadership studies, Joseph William Addai, an administrator, a religious and international development scholar, puts in extensive scholarly and practical work to provide matter-of-factly answers to Africa’s leadership predicament. These are enriched by his participation in diverse programs in North America, Papua New Guinea, Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Of particular note is his drawing from the Ashanti Kingdom’s Manhyia Palace and the late heavyweight Ghanaian neo-liberal conservative political leader William Ofori-Atta (Paa Willie).

It is clear from Addai’s work that from scratch African states were in leadership dilemma ? that’s if they are aware of that and that it is a pressing development issue, and how to reconcile ex-colonial Europe’s individualist-oriented leadership organization with Africa’s traditional group-oriented system. Underpinning all these systems are the foundational values of each society as drivers for effective leadership organization for progress. Africa has leadership difficulty at the moment because its foundational cultural values do not flow dexterously into its modern state organization, as the Japanese have successfully done.

In dealing with both inadequacies of the European leadership system imposed on Africa and the shortfalls of Africa’s traditional leadership organization, Addai compellingly discusses various leadership theories and practices (as an opener to Africa’s) and come out refreshingly with the view that some sort of hybridization of the European and the African systems is needed to make progress.

Perhaps, Addai’s thesis, with the prominent argument that an understanding of African cultural values is indispensable to Africa’s leadership organization and progress, will be of help to attempts to review Ghana’s on-going 20-year old decentralization exercises, which have been more about the ?political and fiscal? without weaving into it Ghana’s cultural receptivity as an organizational necessity and progress mechanism.

Development / Ghana / Africa / modernghana.com

Book Review. Rhapsidies On ‘Kindness’

0

The sacred and profane of state power in the black star of Africa: By Kwesi Yeboah. Rhapsodies On Kindness is a literary and historical work that addresses problems facing contemporary Ghana. This book is very readable, erudite, and engaging. It is anchored on theoretical musings, solid empiricism, and the political economy of the very recent Ghanaian past. Although Ghana is the focal point of analysis, the thematic preoccupations of this book are applicable to Africa as a whole and other regions impacted by the virus of neo-colonialism, dependency, and hegemonic control.

The author, Kwesi Yeboah, a native of Ghana and a product of Achimota College, Achimota, Ghana, has an unusual gift as an activist, public intellectual. He trained at the University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana, as a Classicist and an Historian, and studied Mechanical Engineering, Mathematics, and the Physical Sciences at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, and McMaster University, Hamilton both in Canada. This academic cross-breeding underscores his ability to move from the precincts of superb, intellectualized rhapsodizing to the grounds of sound scientific analyses and theoretical meditations. True to his craft, Yeboah pays flawless attention to detail and seeks coherence and wholeness in satire, caricaturization, theory, and empiricism.

Yeboah is clear about his intention ?to shock, to vigorously jolt the memories and minds of Ghanaians into re-examining that which we have always taken for granted, our attitudes, accepted practices and prevalent mentalities…? (P. xi). These objectives are amply attained throughout this book. Yeboah besmears the noses of his readers with vast metaphorical stretches of excrement, putrefaction, decay, and social flatulence, all symbolizing what has gone wrong in Ghana. On the whole, this book is a theater where Ghanaians are summoned to see the dramatization of the follies and foibles of the Ghanaian past, transposed onto the current political precipice of uncertainty.

Domiciled overseas, Yeboah owes a debt of gratitude to the Ghanaian media forms: they provide a substantial number of the topical news items that inform this book. But it is also obvious that Yeboah makes use of overseas sources that deal with Ghanaian and African affairs, for example, he makes reference to Daily Telegraph’s articles, BBC articles on Africa and African news sites on the world wide web. It must be said that Yeboah’s work is not an intelligent culling of journalistic reminiscences, nor is it based on sympathetic quarrying of topical media news. Rather with remarkable breadth and perceptive synthesis, he brings fresh empirical reflections to illuminate essential historical and contemporary processes.

Rhapsodies is arranged in three parts and each is divided into verses that are not periodized and also do not follow any precise thematic format. Part One is entitled ?The Shock?, Part Two is called ?The Awe?, and Part Three is ?The Sacred and the Profane?. There are forty-five verses and each has notes and references. Simply the structure of this book, essentially the verses, mirror daily topical issues on recent developments. Using the most recent social, political, and economic developments as his scale-pan, Yeboah pries back and forth into the history of Ghana, drawing on various historical incidents and political milestones. Hence, he is able to appraise specific issues while caricaturizing specific historical actors. Overall, a thread of consistency conjoins the varying parts o! f the book and enables him to grapple with various topical issues without straying from his stated objectives

The richness of this book is derived from its subject matter and the stylistic approaches employed by the author. Yeboah employs history as a vehicle of literary deployment. For instance, by echoing the sycophantic accolades of Ghanaian heads of states, he is able to bring readers to the frontiers of history, while at the same time conveying his message of power-drunk leaders. The solid scholarship that undergirds this book is demonstrated, for example, by Yeboah’s references to Milton’s epic, The Paradise Lost; the American War of Independence and the American Civil War; Nkrumah’s ideological construction of Neocolonialism; IMF policies and their implications for development/underdevelopment; and the policies of African leaders, including Joachim Chissano of Mozambique, Thabo Mbeki o! f South Africa, and Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria. Similarly, his literary allusions range from the Classics through Shakespeare and Dickens and Conrad to Achebe and Ayikwei Armah

The joy of reading this book also comes from Yeboah’s assiduous use of satire, humor, self-invented phrases, childhood reminiscences, comparative perspectives, caricaturization, allusions, and derisive songs. As a Ghanaian writing this ? Foreword?, I must say that my ears have enjoyed the derisive songs the most. For example, Part 1, Verse 19, entitled, ?The Epiphany of Jurassic Joseph Henry ? is not only a mockery of time-worn, dinosaured public officials, but also provides some insights into the failure of the state to disengage from antiquated practices seeded in the heyday of colonial rule and at the dawn of neocolonialism. In the end, such derisive songs provide an ample relief that is at once joyous and compelling.

Rhapsodies is not all about the hopelessness of the Ghanaian situation. Interspersed with the dredges of pessimism are embers of hope and optimism for the future. Indeed, this book is not only about mountains of overt criticism of the Ghanaian political debacle. It contains oases of hope and inspiration as well as practical solutions regarding, for instance, the cassava industry, road-building, the application of science and technology to better everyday life, education, governance, and democracy. It is a book for Ghanaians who care about where they had been, where they are going, and how they plan to get there; and certainly, public officials and the elites, those indicted the most in this book, can benefit from Yeboah’s practical solutions.

Several interesting topical issues are discussed in this book. It is obvious, in some cases, that Ghanaians would rather Yeboah had not washed their dirty communal linen in public. For example, Part 1, Verse 1, entitled ?Of Underdevelopment and Human Excrement? Yeboah rubs the noses of Ghanaians in their own collective excrement. Among others, Yeboah states that ?Take the bucket latrine for instance. In this day and age, this twenty-first century of unbelievable technological wonders, and still in Ghana, people, are paid by the state to carry other people’s excrements in buckets, and on their heads.? (P. 8). Although, it is the state that is blamed here and certainly fingers can be pointed at those who are responsible, this is not a story that Ghanaians would like to tell the whole world.

But there are other verses whose filth does not besmear every Ghanaian. Yeboah’s presentation of corruption, graft, theft, and ethnicized nepotistic brokerage of national resources and wealth singles out public officials. Thus, the citizenry is granted the comfort of blaming the elites in high places for the problems facing Ghana today. Indeed, Ghanaians who read this book would not need to cover their nostrils or shift a little in their chairs of passivity all the time because elsewhere Yeboah places the problem of underdevelopment at the doors of others. In Part 1, Verse 3, entitled ?In Search of Heroes,? for instance Yeboah points to neocolonialism and dependency as the causes of Ghana’s endemic problems. But it should stressed th! at he does not belabor the forces of neocolonialism and dependency, perhaps doing so would undermine his avowed theme of jolting Ghanaians to the reality of their own engineered underdevelopment.

Although Rhapsodies may appear to the untutored eye as a shopping list of the political economy of everything Ghanaian, there are specific major themes that ring out in the verses. These include Yeboah’s favorite topics: federation versus regionalism, dependency and underdevelopment, corruption and elitism, problems of chieftaincy, education and social change, and governance and democracy. These and other topics inform the verses and provide for their composite wholeness. The thrust of this book is political. Yeboah has critically dissected the public lives of numerous Ghanaians, including heads of state from Kwame Nkrumah to J. A. Kufour. But Yeboah does! not single out any one leader for praise or vitriolic attack. Rather, he points to their respective strengths and weaknesses, hence is able to provide a superstructure of balance and objectivity for this book.

Yeboah has dealt with controversial, sacred-cow topics in an engaging way. Crisp phrases, textual brevity, and hilarity, anchored on theoretical brilliance and empirical insights would push readers toward a higher level of analytical and conceptual thinking. His epistemological insights are interesting and generous, though we cannot say that for his treatment of most of the personalities that inhabit this book. If Ayi Kwei Armah’s literary capital jolted Ghanaians to the perils of the immediate postcolonial era, Kwesi Yeboah’s work would jolt Ghanaians to move beyond passive acceptance to active evaluation in their search for the seeds of success. I have read Rhapsodies with profit and strongly believe that even those who are caricaturized and satirized within the pages of this promising book would find it intellectually stimul! ating and morally engaging. I venture to say that Yeboah has more crusading epistles for Ghanaians, therefore, we should continue to nurse our backsides in anticipation of more laughter even as we scratch our heads for answers.

PS: The book can be previewed at akoben publishing

Kwabena Akurang-Parry, Ph. D.

Department of History & Philosophy

Shippensburg University

F.L. Bartels of Mfantsipim celebrates 99 years -Book Review

0

was depressed by the sombre fate?.

There’s a sorrowful satisfaction in knowing that one is not alone in these thoughts. With a maverick lending his credence, posterity might develop a thick skin to avoid a future mishap. Let’s follow Mr Bartels’s strategic sense (as a member of an initial committee of four charged to shape the new university):

?I did my best to persuade [Commissioner Hagan] to consider building the new university on, and among, the hills of Cape Coast [to] function as an enabling institution [to] give as well as take, grow and become a part of the town and learn to assist it in solving its problems. The project’s possibilities were vast. Mount Hope could be a strategic point [to] begin and mesh with the slum clearance envisaged for the town? making it imperative for university personnel [to use] local amenities [and] in their own interest demand efficient management.

?The Cape Coast Castle could be converted into a research library and flats to promote academic tourism and a university extramural programme, [to] ultimately extend to the other castles and forts along the coast. The Cape Coast churches could be university chapels. Lastly, the Victoria Park ?might be turned into an open-air theatre to promote drama and other cultural activities for town and gown?.

The Plan

The plan implied a re-invention of higher education for ?hands-on? social and economic good. It was a masterpiece, and was sold in a way in which it had to be bought. But, the Commissioner was not moved; he craved ?another Legon?a self-contained showpiece [with] a separate existence?.

To Mr Bartels, ?Another Legon, Accra, was the last thing Nkrumah fancied. But he got it.? The Commissioner’s thinking was like that of David Balme, a classics scholar of repute, the founding principal of Legon, who admitted: ?You’ve asked me to establish a university. The university I know is Cambridge.?

Mr Bartels envisaged the thrust of the sciences ?to direct the thinking of students to education for work, using the environmental resources of the area, [for example] the fishery industry that was being developed at Elmina [and] the support it would require from the interdisciplinary research in Geography, Meteorology and Refrigeration Engineering?.

The plan was ignored. A later report from an ?International Commission [with] Geoffrey Bing? came out, placing reliance on prospects ?no different basically from Legon?.

In seeking a new deal for education in Cape Coast, Mr Bartels’s ideas, perhaps, created a discomfort, or worse, fear. The colonial mindset was shaken. The new thinking implied a shift from the obsolete lecturing-and-copying format, to a preference for a purposeful re-design of teaching and learning in the wider context of a hands-on urban renewal. Without an assertive, practical access to freedom of judgement and imagination, education itself is stale.

Cape Coast, as an education capital, stood to generate a livelier, intellectual, research, and superior tourist industry, with leverage for clusters of jobs. The intellectual, the economic and the social go together. With a better quality of life, professional people who deliver important services would stay. An urban renaissance created a dynamic and capacity strengthening a wider area.

A vision-gap is a costly thing. Many university towns have blazed that trail and flourished in the midst (not on the periphery) of urban renewals; for example, the connection between the University of California, Los Angeles and the city of Westwood (in the U.S.), and the penchant of that union for creating employment, and student jobs.

Mr Bartels’s vision, alas, shunned the habit of skimping on the maintenance of existing national assets, pouring good money into newish things, and setting in train a cycle of neglect. Possibly, the disregard for the plan mirrored two puzzles: one, the na?ve assumption that, somehow, distribution of benefits is a zero-sum game; and two, the elitists’ phobia for the teeming masses, and preference for the suburban nest and rest.

For a new, independent nation, the opportunity loss was worse than a study of reflexes in the aristocratic psyche. It was hard to escape the suspicion that what was bliss for Cambridge turned out to be bale to Cape Coast. As between liberation and servitude, Mr Bartels drew the line between visions of national self-assertion and timid copies of the archaic.

The past is all very well. But why misjudge the echoes of the times? The outdated wisdom that tertiary education has to be packaged, somehow, within enclosed quarters has become as insidious as the insistence that every phone has to have wires attached. Now the times give the proof that functional illiteracy is the virus to dismantle, and purge.

The Persistence of Paradox is a must read. As a biography, the canvas is full with the texture and colour of a life spanning almost a century. It draws seamlessly on a vast repertoire with anecdotes, some highlighted with fun (and slaps) in Akan (Fanti): (Nkye mobobo n’asowa mu ma w’atse). Mr Bartels’s other books include, the 2007 latest, ?Journey out of the African Maze: Indigenous and Higher Education in Tandem? (www.lulu.com); and ?Roots of Ghana Methodism? (Cambridge University Press, 1965).

In talking with Mr Bartels, his personal takes on key historic events and people, and the details in the making of those experiences, held one glued like a bond. More grease to his years. Mfantsipimfo, the Methodist Church, and the nation at large should be geared, properly, for Mr Bartels’s 100 years anniversary, 13th March 2010. He gave so much to broaden and elevate the nation’s collective thought. [This piece, published in a different form in 2004, is revisited for the anniversary].

[Anis Haffar, the author, is the founder of Gate Institute, a consulting service for continuous teacher education in English Language skills, and Methodologies for Leadership-centred teaching for primary, secondary, and tertiary levels. Email: [email protected]. Website: www.gate.ghanaschoolsonline.com]

Do you have an article for publication? Please email it to [email protected](‘/ghanahome/includes/home/pics.asp?id=1′,’xphotos’);

BOOK REVIEW: Harmattan Rain

0

“Harmattan Rain, Ayesha Harruna Attah’s first novel is set in The Gold Coast/Ghana in 1954, and tells the story of three generations of women. Lizzie-Achiaa runs away from her home in Adukrom No.2 to escape her father, Papa Yaw’s crude attempts to marry her off to any old suitor, but more urgently, to find her lover, Bador Samed who had disappeared after their first love encounter. She eventually arrives in Accra where she becomes Mrs. Mensah. Her first daughter, Akua Afriyie, walks out of Kingsley House, Achimota School just before her A-level Examinations to have her daughter Sugri, the result of a girlish escapade. Sugri, a brilliant student wins a scholarship to study Medicine at Columbia University in New York. Alone in that big, impersonal city she learns about life and grows up.

The story spans the period, 1954 to 1999, the beginning of which era the people of this country became ‘politically active’. Politics is the backdrop of Ayesha’s novel and she uses it with historical accuracy and her consummate skill as a story teller. Everyone talks politics. Even the Irish nun, Mother Constance expresses her doubts about this country’s readiness for independence.Lizzie-Achiaa visits Kumasi in the midst of an NLM rally and has a taste of the determined opposition to Nkrumah’s CPP, and throughout the novel comments and opinions on each head of state from Nkrumah through Busia, Archeampong to Rawlings are freely and, sometimes, brutally expressed wherever people gather. Ayesha’s judicious use of contemporary views and attitudes to politics and politicians greatly enhances the value and appeal of this outstanding novel.

Harmattan Rain is skillfully structured, making it very ‘reader-friendly’. In addition to the age-old style of giving each chapter a title, we are given dates to mark the passage of time, and snippets of news from the radio and newspapers to update us on events. The epilogue which is dominated by Papa Yaw mellowed by age and telling us what had happened ?back in the early fifties,? is a particularly skillful device which is both poignant and beautiful.

One of the many outstanding qualities of Harmattan Rain is Ayesha’s talent for observation. She literally ‘never misses a thing’ and this, together with her remarkable insight into the Ghanaian psyche, makes her description of real places, people and events, recognizable and unforgettable. We are compelled to be more than onlookers. We become participants. We were with the silent ring of spectators when Papa Yaw, exuding palm wine fumes and armed with a neem branch, mercilessly beats his rebellious daughter. Ayesha takes us along as Lizzie runs away from home stumbling through forest and farm, plunging into the River Nsu to get as far away from Adukrom No2 as possible. We watch helplessly as soldiers ransack Asantewa’s store, destroying valuable goods in their search for hoarded goods. We recognize the fop in the tan suit and pressed hair in the nightclub, and enjoy Ayesha’s satirical account of his crude advances to Lizzie.

Women Empowerment

Click for Full Size Ayesha Harruna Attah, author of the Harmattan Rain pix:Sefa Nkansa

I am persuaded that Harmattan Rain is really about the empowerment of women, but with a difference. This is not the empowerment that comes as a special favour from others to be dispensed in gender-sensitive morsels but the strength that comes from within each woman who has the character and intelligence to grasp each opportunity as Lizzie does, or cut their losses and move on as her daughter Afriyie succeeds in doing. A single mother at sixteen and estranged from her mother she brings up her daughter Sugri with determined dedication, sacrifice and friendship. Ayesha’s portrayal of mother, daughter and granddaughter is masterly.They have the same determined spirit and often disagree but their bonding is very clearly and delicately drawn.

The men in Harmattan Rain are somewhat diminished in stature by the women. Mr. Mensah is kind but colourless, John Barnor Afriyie’s boss, bumbles. Pastor Edem Adomza is deceitfully self-righteous and Rashid, Sugri’s errant father, belongs to a line of heartless seducers of young girls. Many years later his victim, Afriyie, dismisses him with the delightful irony, ?Have you seen that pot belly?? Bador Samed stalks the pages of the novel like a lost soul. A heroic figure, he finds his loved one never to be parted from her. This, the only real tragedy in the novel is unexpected and with a beauty that haunts.

Ama Ata Aidoo in launching Harmattan Rain called it ?a coming ?of ?age novel? And so it is, for this is Ayesha Harruna Attah’s first novel and written at twenty five. It is a novel of remarkable maturity, written in lucid and succinct prose and full of imagination, boldness and humour. We expect that these and other excellent qualities will grow and endure.”

Credit: Frances Ademola, reviewed in the Daily Graphic

Book Review: CHASING THE ELEPHANT INTO THE BUSH

0

The cover of Dr. Arthur Kennedy's book CHASING THE ELEPHANT INTO THE BUSH: THE POLITICS OF COMPLACENCY The cover of Dr. Arthur Kennedy’s book CHASING THE ELEPHANT INTO THE BUSH: THE POLITICS OF COMPLACENCY

Title: CHASING THE ELEPHANT INTO THE BUSH: THE POLITICS OF COMPLACENCY

Author: DR. ARTHUR KENNEDY
Publishers: AUTHORHOUSE, Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Price: $24.99 from Amazon.com
xvi, 173 pp, Introduction, Acknowledgements and Foreword.

?There are just not enough of us? — Arthur Kennedy book review.

By COLIN ESSAMUAH
Dr. Arthur Kennedy, the director of communications in the presidential campaign of the NPP presidential candidate, Nana Addo-Dankwa Akufo-Addo, in the 2008 elections has done his party and this nation a world of good by providing us with his narrative of the most-expensive, media-heavy campaign in the history of electoral politics in Ghana. I say his party would benefit from sober reflection on the matters disclosed in this short book, although to a man, and woman, he has attracted universal condemnation from his party colleagues for his effort.

Members of the party that authored THE STOLEN VERDICT have displayed a degree of intolerance and disgust for Arthur Kennedy that is breathtaking in its viciousness. The only person who has welcomed the book publicly, did so in terms which were no less damning. Mr. Daniel Botwe who must know the author far better than the several others who have reacted to the book, praised him, but condemned the choice of title and the publication which he felt should have been kept within party ranks. Obviously, to the NPP, the rights of free expression and intellectual freedom, which they claim to have championed since 1992, are inapplicable in this instance, even to a fellow party stalwart.

Comprising twenty short chapters with a perceptive but sad foreword by Yaw Boadu Ayeboafo, General Manager of the Daily Graphic, this is a crisp, extremely reader-friendly work that will enlighten, educate, shock and entertain its readers. It is also likely to sadden a large number with its open yet careful assessment of the failings of individuals in the campaign, and the determined but enthusiastic wrongheadedness which drove many decisions. Dr. Kennedy joins a large and growing number of people and local and foreign scholars who have written on elections in Ghana since 1992. The unique perspective he offers from his participation in the NPP presidential primaries in December 2007, and his service as the communications guru of the NPP presidential campaign is his claim to fame, or notoriety, in the estimation of Ghanaians. For instance, the hagiographic work of Mr. Fred Asante, ex-Member of the Council of State, titled THE KUFUOR LEGACY, on the 1996, 2000 and 2004 elections did not attract a fraction of the interest that Dr. Kennedy has aroused in and outside his party with his far shorter narrative on the 2008 elections. The NPP must move away from demonizing party members who have different opinions from those held by the power centres in its ranks.

However, if one is not careful, one may be misled into accepting what Dr. Kennedy says as conclusive of the factors which caused the defeat of the NPP in the December 2008 presidential and parliamentary elections, even though these factors have been cited and accepted by others before him. This is another way of answering the oft-asked question about what caused the defeat of the NPP in the 2008 elections. The contribution of Dr. Kennedy to the several answers out there is that his work reflects the triumphalist mood which drove the campaign, and in so doing, enables us to deepen our understanding of the three whys in this campaign, the defeat itself, the narrowness of defeat, and the painful reception of defeat by party members.

The author lists nine reasons at the end of the book which led to defeat. They are all valid, just as the positive factors listed at the beginning of the book which should have guaranteed the so-called One-Touch victory for the NPP. What caused the defeat therefore cannot be a mere recitation of events, policies, behaviour patterns and propaganda as we all have tended to accept, but rather a massive misunderstanding of the Ghanaian electorate which, given the positive factors also engendered by the same delusions, may be forgiveable. This is the charitable position to take on the matter.

Dr. Kennedy makes clear, line after line in his book, that the NPP as a corporate body, then and now, suffered fatally from a delusional triumphalism that electoral defeat was impossible, and therefore, unthinkable. This illogical belief affected every political decision, and every propaganda step they took during the campaign. It is delusional triumphalism which produced 18 presidential aspirants, including ALL the senior ministers in the Kufuor cabinet, including his blood brother, Kwame Addo-Kufuor, plus three sojourners in Europe and America, Boakye Agyarko, Agyei-Barwuah and the author himself. It is the delusion of victory that produced the inherent belief in party ranks that the opposition NDC was no factor, even though as early as August, 2008, the NPP had been warned that the non-existent opposition NDC could force a second round, courtesy the advice of Professor Larry Gibson. I must add here rather quickly, that the figures Professor Gibson worked with were crude concoctions emanating from the same delusions of triumph that drove everything else in the NPP.

The most serious and in the end, most fatal delusion that seized and gripped the NPP was the belief that the electorate did not exist. ‘Agbenaa’ was the Ga version of that particular delusion. Hitching a tro-tro ride from Abossey Okai to Korle Bu was a farcical epiphany of the Palm Sunday procession. The campaign was not seen as a contest between the party and the unbowed NDC, but as a coronation, where the only requirement was for the crown prince to be present at the enthronement ceremony. Dr. Kennedy asserts the same when he calls into question who the target audiences were for the various campaign initiatives. Pollster Ben Ephson’s just-published work on the election reports the stunning fact that of the 500 young men and women who were polled after the Labadi Beach musical concert staged as part of the campaign, only 9 said they would vote for the NPP presidential candidate in the December 2008 polls. Ephson reports again that only 90 out of 1000 respondents said they would vote for Nana Akufo-Addo at the Believe in Ghana bash. For the lack of understanding, empathy and concern for the Ghanaian voter, Dr. Kennedy fell victim to the giddiness in the NPP campaign train when he employs the word complacency.

The truth of the matter, however, is that the NPP 2008 campaign was the most comprehensive, thorough, well-funded, staffed and motivated effort in the history of electioneering in Ghana. Let me give two pedestrian examples. How many of us can remember any NDC campaign song, but the sarcastic Lumba lyrics still gets airtime a year after the elections? I personally counted five huge Nana Akuffo Addo hoardings at the Liberation Circle alone in Accra, and wondered who were the intended audience for this advertising overkill. The NPP carpet-bombed the country with adverts, songs, rallies, concerts, and media endorsements. The problem of explaining defeat can be likened to the Rope-a-Dope strategy of Muhammad Ali in the October, 1974 Rumble in the Jungle fight in Kinshasa in which he defeated the overmighty and deadly George Foreman by systematically sapping the latter’s overwhelming strength.

But the delusions of inevitable triumph still persist even as the author joins the chorus in the party that 2012 would see the NPP back in power. The general contempt for the ability of the NDC to recapture power after two harrowing terms in opposition marked by the reckless, careless and dangerous abuse of the judicial process to jail their leading members, damnation to perpetual opposition with the pointless national reconciliation project, and a vicious, unchristian and ungentlemanly attack on their candidate, Professor Mills, should have abated by now. In the higher circles of the NPP, the repeated forays of President Mills into the Central Region were seen as proof positive of his failing health, and not of his single-minded determination to persuade his kinsmen to vote for him.

Dr. Kennedy is simply being the uncharitable NPP politician who refuses to appreciate that the present constitution and the structure of our politics, are the products of the PNDC from which the NDC was begotten, and the very least one can do as a patriot of the land, is to respect if not love them, like the converted Saul, for finally coming round to accepting civilian, democratic and constitutional rule, and not to continually mock them. Fortunately, the people of this country know better.

Dr. Kennedy rightly questions the lack of active employment of President Kufuor in the campaign, but he declines to tell us really why since his answer would be self-incriminating. The leadership of President Kufuor was never respected in the ranks of the party, and in defiance of party esprit d’corps, leading members of the party delighted in ridiculing and defying the judgement and direction of a man they had freely chosen and campaigned for, and happily accepted positions from, to run this country. But President Kufuor himself did not help matters when for the position of national chairman for the party in 2005, he backed an obvious Johnny-come-lately Stephen Ntim. Ntim who was completely apolitical during our Legon days in 1980 was an attempted imposition whose audacity eclipses the so-called Swedru declaration of President Rawlings. But in refusing to endorse Vice-President Aliu Mahama to replace him as the NPP nominee, and backing his kinsman, Allan Kyeremateng, President Kufuor was following in the footsteps of his mentor Victor Owusu, who also chose Kufuor.

It is clear therefore, that both President Kufuor and his party were embarking on a disastrous journey where the former’s choices were indefensible, and the latters’ disrespect untenable. Seen in this light, the violent disagreements and opposition to a retiring president endorsing anybody in the 2007 NPP primaries marks the party as incapable of strategizing. The other way of looking at this is that the NPP is an ethnic cult. This is one aspect of the defeat that Dr.. Kennedy declines to address, only stating the patently foolish appeal of the late Hawa Yakubu to President Kufuor not to support anyone for the top prize in the party. I fail to see the wisdom in denying President Kufuor the privileges of leadership. That the privilege was exercised wrongly is another matter. When President Reagan was asked by pressmen what advice he would give to his Vice-President George Bush, Snr, as the latter sought the Republican nomination in 1988, he replied ‘Take no prisoners.’ No one questioned or doubted Reagan’s right to back someone to replace him. It is worth attempting an answer to how the NPP came to this sorry pass.

The NPP traces its direct roots not to the genteel, aristocratic UGCC of 1947, but to the rough and tumble band of discontents of the NLM of 1954, whose politics were marked first and foremost by ethnic supremacy and the sanctification of chiefly rule in the Forest Akan areas of Ghana. The relevance of this is that the position of vice-president is seen as a token sop to the other ethnic groups in Ghana, and not as a practical stepping-stone to the presidency, as it is designed to be everywhere except in Obasanjo’s PDP in Nigeria. Nowhere in the book, or elsewhere in the public debate at the time, is the concern expressed about the suitability of any of the running mate aspirants for the ultimate job, the presidency.

Dr. Kennedy misses the point therefore when he asserts that the NPP ticket has been more inclusive than that of the NDC since 1992. Does he believe that Mills, Amidu, Mumuni and Mahama are not fit to be presidents of this country? What about Kow Arkaah who performed the political hat trick of being the running mate of two opposing parties? If the NPP ticket is more inclusive, why did Dr. Kennedy not spend his energies to persuade President Kufuor and his party to do the natural and proper thing by endorsing Vice-President Aliu Mahama?

The delusion is further illustrated when NPP members and their backers in the chattering classes cite the narrowness of defeat as evidence of the inevitable return to power in 2012. Dr. Kennedy is a passionate believer in this numbers nonsense emanating from our collective acceptance of election polls and figures which make no statistical or political sense. We have had elections in this country since 1951, and we thus have a fair idea of the shape and contours of victory, permitting us to live with the figures produced. Incidentally, it is a study of these figures which have informed my position that the NDC has taken over the CPP pattern of electoral support in this country. But the election figures of 2008, and to a lesser extent, that of 2004, seem extremely suspicious. For the author to take psychic comfort in 205,000 spoilt ballots in NPP strongholds which robbed the party of deserved victory and the fallacious reversion to ethnocentric politics where the Volta vote is condemned is regrettable, and unworthy of his fine mind. I will counsel him to read carefully the meticulously researched article on the 2008 elections by Jockers, Kohnert and Nugent, which laid the blame squarely for malfeasance in this election at the doorsteps of the ruling NPP.

The internal NPP polls which gave an 8-10% margin of victory over the NDC were all concocted from whole cloth, and designed to give evidential support to self-generated positive propaganda. Is it not striking that Larry Gibson working with these fantastic numbers, still gave victory to the NDC, albeit by a whisker? It is this particular delusion that has made defeat extremely painful for the rank and file of the NPP to bear.

The title of this essay was chosen from page 91 of the book where Dr. Kennedy lays his finger, rather unintentionally, on the structural deformity in the support base of the NPP. The party has a base in the Forest Akan areas of Ghana, but that base is not homogenous in voting patterns, or even in ethnic purity. That is why people are still rightly puzzled by the immoral fight of the party to claim victory when it won only two regions in the run-off, a move which also sought to deny that coat tail voting is the norm in this country. The problem of the NPP in confecting a durable national spread can only be addressed by following the constitutional requirement for regional balance in political leadership in this country. To Ursula Owusu, an NPP stalwart who asserted in a radio programme recently that ‘we have the numbers’, Dr. Kennedy rightly replies that ‘there are just not enough of us’ in the base of the party.

There are other juicy plums in this book which have seized our attention. The book reminds us that the NPP candidate is yet to concede defeat in this election, even after the Electoral Commission had declared President Atta Mills the victor. Professor Gibson’s recommendation to the campaign to abandon attacking the genuinely popular President Rawlings was ignored. Dr. Kennedy asserts that Nana Addo had ‘more legitimate populist credentials’ than any Ghanaian politician since Nkrumah, when the two of us in a conversation three years ago, had likened the political credentials of Nana Addo to that of the populist Mexican politician Cuanhtemoc Cardenas, who was born in the presidential palace in Mexico City when his father was president! Cardenas never became Mexican president! The reference to the Akyem Mafia reflects the disgust in party ranks and in the country at large, with the large number of family members and Kumasi hangers-on in the Kufuor presidency, which Nana Akufo-Addo seemed willing to continue with his own cabal if he had won. Their presence and access to the candidate is the problem, not the gifts and talents of some of them which Dr. Kennedy rightly argues made them an asset. In a democracy, people are right to resent the ennoblement and empowerment of family which is the norm in a monarchy.

When Kweku Baako and Gabby Otchere Darko were condemning the work, they had obviously not read the book, because the references to them were kind and generous. Gabby, in particular, seems set on a campaign to prove that indeed, he has the capacity to ‘casually offend.’ What is wrong with ‘outing’ Professor Badoe, Edward Boateng and Ahomka-Lindsay as NPP stalwarts? Preservation of the fiction of their objectivity in partisan politics is not a national good. Again, if the book contains nothing unknown to the public, why spend so much energy in attacking Dr. Kennedy? Their efforts are unlikely to disturb the confident, even-tempered and calm doctor who fought the Rawlings regime when some of them were in their diapers. The critics betray a collective low self-esteem that may mask envy of the attention that this unsuccessful presidential aspirant is getting. They predict that he has no future in the NPP, a level of vindictiveness and viciousness that does not surprise me. I have been there before, when I roundly criticized the NPP for indulging in alliance politics in the 1996 elections. Dr. Kennedy needs neither his party nor friends to be relevant in this country’s politics. He has his God, his conscience and his countrymen as his surest compass to relevance.

The delusion continues when President Kufuor seeks to correct the record on the Tain fiasco. Dr. Kennedy’s version accords with the public record. Both the president and the author would want us to believe Tain was an inevitable part of the election when we know it was called into play by the humiliated NPP after the run-off when President Mills had won with 23,000 votes. The party then briefly embraced disintegration and oblivion when it chose to go to court to estop the EC. President Kufuor and B.J. da Rocha, in public rebuttals, saved the party to enable it fight another day. What Dr. Kennedy has done is to show the NPP the mistakes to avoid in that future fight, and for that, the party ought to be deeply grateful to him.

Returnee Moses Asaga: Hard work pays

0

The Minister-designate for Employment and Social Welfare, Moses Asaga, has told Citi News that it was as a result of hard work that the President of Ghana John Evans Atta Mills gave him a ministerial appointment.

An elated Asaga said on Citi Eyewitness News hours after the news broke on Wednesday that he had always wanted to serve in the Prof. Mills-led administration and feels the time has come for him to unleash what is under his sleeves for the good people of Ghana.

Hon. Asaga, who until his appointment was the chairman of the Parliamentary Select Committee on Mines and Energy, Oil and Gas, sees his new designation as a reward from the President after having worked selflessly ever since the National Democratic Congress (NDC) assumed office in 2009.

“I’m happy because I have joined the squad,” he said. “I’m committed to work for development and Ghana as a whole. I really wanted to serve government and this is another stage. I know that hard work to mother Ghana will always be rewarded. ”

Asaga, who is the MP for Nabdam, said he will aim at establishing a good rapport between his office and the leadership of labour unions in order to keep peace on the labour front.

In 2009, Asaga was withdrawn as water resources, works and housing minister-designate for ordering the payment of the controversial ex-gratia awards without recourse to his colleagues in Parliament or the transition team of the new government then led by President Mills.

He has been a Member of Parliament since 1997.

Source: citifmonline

BOOK REVIEW: Yendi Chieftaincy Trials Of 1987

0

Title: YENDI CHIEFTAINCY TRIALS OF 1987 Author: George AGYEKUM Pages: 595 The book covers two trials held in Tamale in 1987 concerning two violent incidents in Yendi and Linbunga in December 1986 and January 1987 on the aftermath of the Supreme Court decision on the Yendi Skin Affairs. The book illustrates a vivid account of events during the trial. Even though a criminal trial the cultural and traditional practices were quite eminent as if it was a trial of what were the right customary laws and usage. The introduction to the book takes the reader through a vivid simulation of what took place and causes of the conflicts and possible solutions. The revelation of the role govt played in releasing Salifu Amankwah and the intrigue and scheming is worth noting in this line the govt statement published in the Daily Graphic at page 508 is worth scrutiny. In the glossary of has several explanations of traditional titles and positions. There are several news paper cuttings in the book and what really catches the eye of the reader is on page 522 has important historical coincidences. The late Gen. F.W.K. Akuffo as a Commander is seen visiting his troops in 1969 at the conflict area. There is a group picture of Gen A.A. Afrifa, then Chairman Presidential Commission and Dr. Busia then Prime Minister at page 518, meeting some of the Chiefs and leaders of the Abudu and Andani gates in Accra. The writer of the story captioned ‘Yendi A Mini War’ was no one other than Boakye Djan then not as a soldier but a Journalist. (The historical evolution is revealing, between 1969-1979 and their new roles i.e. Akuffo and Boakye Djan. Just within 10 years) The book also has the Dagbon Constitution incorporated in full. Until I read the book little did I know that the Dagamba people had a comprehensive constitution helped to compile by the British in 193O. It traces the ancestral history of the Dagamba people and the role the drummers and drums play in the history and culture of the people. This explains the reason also why some of the conflicts arose out of festivals and drumming centred gatherings and issues. The sub title ‘Conflict Resolution Through Judicial Action’ still illustrates the challenges to the judiciary in a modern state. But is the statement correct? The decision of the Supreme Court ignited the riots as both parties asserted themselves in victory and defeat. It ended as a lose, lose situation. But the other sub title ‘A Clash between State and Traditional Norms’ sums up the basis of the whole conflict. As the facts in the book reveals it is up to opinion leaders, The National House of Chiefs and the Eminent Chiefs, who are acting as mediators to find a way of resolving the Conflict between State and Traditional Norms. The Yendi conflict is an old one but in bridging the gap between the state and traditional norms, without undermining the rich culture and historic traditions is a challenging task. For the researcher/ sociologist an even NGO operating in the Dagbon area. Knowledge of facts from the book as a background information is recommended. Schools if it could be afforded should be explored so that the youth can see the